{"title":"“More of a Liability than an Asset”: Victorian Women’s Advocacy for Other Animals","authors":"C. Wrenn","doi":"10.1163/15685306-bja10017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the nonhuman animal rights movement in the West is frequently framed by activists and remembered by historians as gender-neutral, Donaldson’s (2020) Women against Cruelty (which examines meeting notes and campaigning documents reaching back to the movement’s founding in the early 19th century) demonstrates just the opposite. Women’s affinity for anti-speciesist activism within the context of a prevailing sexism which pitted all female pursuits as lesser-than would prove a difficult hurdle to surmount with regard to social movement resonance. This is not to reify or reduce women’s contributions. Women against Cruelty catalogs a diversity of feminine and feminist approaches to advancing the interests of nonhuman animals: some religious, some scientific, and some \nintersectional. Many women favored educational outreach, while others relied on rational debate, shocking images, direct intervention, and legal resistance.","PeriodicalId":22000,"journal":{"name":"Society & Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15685306-bja10017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the nonhuman animal rights movement in the West is frequently framed by activists and remembered by historians as gender-neutral, Donaldson’s (2020) Women against Cruelty (which examines meeting notes and campaigning documents reaching back to the movement’s founding in the early 19th century) demonstrates just the opposite. Women’s affinity for anti-speciesist activism within the context of a prevailing sexism which pitted all female pursuits as lesser-than would prove a difficult hurdle to surmount with regard to social movement resonance. This is not to reify or reduce women’s contributions. Women against Cruelty catalogs a diversity of feminine and feminist approaches to advancing the interests of nonhuman animals: some religious, some scientific, and some
intersectional. Many women favored educational outreach, while others relied on rational debate, shocking images, direct intervention, and legal resistance.
尽管西方的非人类动物权利运动经常被活动人士和历史学家描述为性别中立,但唐纳森(2020年)的《反对虐待妇女》(Women against Cruelty)(研究了19世纪初该运动成立以来的会议记录和活动文件)所展示的恰恰相反。在普遍存在的性别歧视背景下,女性对反物种主义活动的亲和力使所有女性的追求都显得微不足道,这在社会运动共鸣方面将被证明是一个难以逾越的障碍。这并不是要具体化或减少妇女的贡献。反对虐待妇女组织列出了各种女性化和女权主义的方法来促进非人类动物的利益:一些是宗教的,一些是科学的,还有一些是交叉的。许多妇女支持教育外展,而其他人则依靠理性辩论、令人震惊的图像、直接干预和法律抵抗。
期刊介绍:
Society & Animals publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the Social Sciences (e.g., psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science) and the Humanities (e.g., history, literary criticism).
The journal specifically deals with subjects such as human-animal interactions in various settings (animal cruelty, the therapeutic uses of animals), the applied uses of animals (research, education, medicine and agriculture), the use of animals in popular culture (e.g. dog-fighting, circus, animal companion, animal research), attitudes toward animals as affected by different socializing agencies and strategies, representations of animals in literature, the history of the domestication of animals, the politics of animal welfare, and the constitution of the animal rights movement.