Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents’ Experiences with Pediatricians: A Mixed-Methods Study

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Adoption Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-02-03 DOI:10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839
A. Goldberg, Reihonna L. Frost, Melissa H. Manley, Nora M. McCormick, JuliAnna Z. Smith, D. Brodzinsky
{"title":"Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents’ Experiences with Pediatricians: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"A. Goldberg, Reihonna L. Frost, Melissa H. Manley, Nora M. McCormick, JuliAnna Z. Smith, D. Brodzinsky","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite unique health risks and outcomes among adopted children, most pediatricians receive little training about this population. The current mixed-methods study explored lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents' (n = 224, in 129 families) experiences with and perspectives on pediatricians. Parents in the study adopted via private domestic, public domestic, and international adoption. Parents who adopted via public domestic adoption were more likely to talk with pediatricians about adoption while parents who adopted internationally were most likely to feel positively about their pediatrician’s adoption competence. Qualitative findings suggest that while parents did not look to pediatricians as sources of adoption expertise, they were disappointed when doctors did not take the adoption context into account when providing medical treatment. Findings hold implications for adoptive families, adoption practitioners, and health professionals, especially pediatricians.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"27 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Despite unique health risks and outcomes among adopted children, most pediatricians receive little training about this population. The current mixed-methods study explored lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents' (n = 224, in 129 families) experiences with and perspectives on pediatricians. Parents in the study adopted via private domestic, public domestic, and international adoption. Parents who adopted via public domestic adoption were more likely to talk with pediatricians about adoption while parents who adopted internationally were most likely to feel positively about their pediatrician’s adoption competence. Qualitative findings suggest that while parents did not look to pediatricians as sources of adoption expertise, they were disappointed when doctors did not take the adoption context into account when providing medical treatment. Findings hold implications for adoptive families, adoption practitioners, and health professionals, especially pediatricians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋领养父母与儿科医生的经历:一项混合方法研究
尽管收养儿童有独特的健康风险和结果,但大多数儿科医生对这一人群的培训很少。当前的混合方法研究探讨了女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋养父母(n = 224, 129个家庭)对儿科医生的经历和看法。研究中的父母通过国内私人收养、国内公共收养和国际收养进行收养。通过国内公开收养的父母更有可能与儿科医生谈论收养问题,而国际收养的父母最有可能对儿科医生的收养能力持积极态度。定性调查结果表明,虽然父母没有将儿科医生视为收养专业知识的来源,但当医生在提供医疗服务时没有考虑到收养情况时,他们感到失望。研究结果对收养家庭、收养从业人员和卫生专业人员,特别是儿科医生具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adoption Quarterly
Adoption Quarterly SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Adoption Quarterly is an unparalleled forum for examining the issues of child care, of adoption as viewed from a lifespan perspective, and of the psychological and social meanings of the word "family." This international, multidisciplinary journal features conceptual and empirical work, commentaries, and book reviews from the fields of the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, law, and social policy. In addition to examining ethical, biological, financial, social and psychological adoption issues, Adoption Quarterly addresses continuity in adoption issues that are important to both practitioners and researchers, such as: negotiation of birth and adoptive family contact.
期刊最新文献
Social Competence, School Engagement, and School Performance Among US Children Adopted Through Private Domestic, International, and Foster Care Adoption A Lonely Position. Misrecognition and Belonging Among International Adoptees in Norway Beyond Telling: A Phenomenology of Adoptive Mothers’ Adoption Communication Openness with Early Adolescents Being Adopted and LGBTQ: An Autoethnographic Study of Intersectionality Long-Term Follow-Up of the Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS) with Adolescent Adoptees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1