Common Errors Found in the Diverse Kinds of Paragraphs Composed by First Year EFL University Students

I. A. M. Tustiawati
{"title":"Common Errors Found in the Diverse Kinds of Paragraphs Composed by First Year EFL University Students","authors":"I. A. M. Tustiawati","doi":"10.26714/lensa.13.1.2023.14-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims at showing the major types of errors that students make in their written products and their perspectives on the cause of errors that they make. In this research, 180 students’ paragraphs were analysed for the purpose of error analysis and a questionnaire was distributed to the students to find out their perspectives on the cause of errors that they made. The errors found in the students’ written products were first categorised into several major categories, then further classified into four general categories: morphological, lexical, syntactical, and mechanical. The findings show that there were 12 major errors that the students made in their writing. Seven of them fall under the category of morphological, two under lexical, one under syntactical and another two under mechanical.  The majority of students are aware that they make errors in their writing but find it hard to allocate them. As a result, they may not be able to correct or avoid the errors. Thus, incorporating error analysis in teaching and learning is a necessary practice for students to minimise the production of errors in their writing. Furthermore, lack of understanding of grammatical functions and limited knowledge of vocabulary are considered the major causes of errors based on the perspectives of the students. Through the classification system provided by the error analysis procedure, teachers are able to address this issue by incorporating smaller groupings of errors into the curriculum and teaching program","PeriodicalId":31773,"journal":{"name":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.1.2023.14-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims at showing the major types of errors that students make in their written products and their perspectives on the cause of errors that they make. In this research, 180 students’ paragraphs were analysed for the purpose of error analysis and a questionnaire was distributed to the students to find out their perspectives on the cause of errors that they made. The errors found in the students’ written products were first categorised into several major categories, then further classified into four general categories: morphological, lexical, syntactical, and mechanical. The findings show that there were 12 major errors that the students made in their writing. Seven of them fall under the category of morphological, two under lexical, one under syntactical and another two under mechanical.  The majority of students are aware that they make errors in their writing but find it hard to allocate them. As a result, they may not be able to correct or avoid the errors. Thus, incorporating error analysis in teaching and learning is a necessary practice for students to minimise the production of errors in their writing. Furthermore, lack of understanding of grammatical functions and limited knowledge of vocabulary are considered the major causes of errors based on the perspectives of the students. Through the classification system provided by the error analysis procedure, teachers are able to address this issue by incorporating smaller groupings of errors into the curriculum and teaching program
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学一年级学生作文中常见的各种段落错误
本研究旨在展示学生在书面作品中犯下的主要错误类型,以及他们对错误原因的看法。在这项研究中,为了进行错误分析,对180名学生的段落进行了分析,并向学生分发了一份问卷,以了解他们对错误原因的看法。在学生的书面作品中发现的错误首先被分为几个大类,然后进一步分为四大类:形态、词汇、句法和机械。研究结果表明,学生在写作中出现了12个主要错误。其中七个属于形态范畴,两个属于词汇范畴,一个属于句法范畴,另外两个属于机械范畴。大多数学生都意识到他们在写作中会犯错误,但发现很难分配错误。因此,他们可能无法纠正或避免错误。因此,将错误分析纳入教学是学生在写作中尽量减少错误产生的必要做法。此外,从学生的角度来看,对语法功能缺乏理解和词汇知识有限是造成错误的主要原因。通过错误分析程序提供的分类系统,教师能够通过将较小的错误分组纳入课程和教学计划来解决这个问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression Symptoms on The Dialogues of Laney Brooks in I Smile Back Movie SONG TRANSLATION OF SPEECHLESS BY NAOMI SCOTT: METAPHOR AND UNTRANSLATABILITY Politeness Levels of Thanking and Apologizing: A Corpus Linguistic Investigation Across Generations in the Movies Go Green Culture in Selametan Katerbi’en Tradition of Madura Conceptualization of Metaphor at the Discourse of the Bali G20 Summit in Online Mass Media: Cognitive Semantic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1