Endangered Languages: A Sociocognitive Approach to Language Death, Identity Loss, and Preservation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Q3 Arts and Humanities Sustainable Multilingualism Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/sm-2022-0011
D. Low, Isaac Mcneill, Michael James Day
{"title":"Endangered Languages: A Sociocognitive Approach to Language Death, Identity Loss, and Preservation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence","authors":"D. Low, Isaac Mcneill, Michael James Day","doi":"10.2478/sm-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Sociolinguists suggest language death entails significant cultural, personal, and ecological loss. Socio-cultural and socio-political factors exacerbate language erosion and encourage supplantation by another more dominant language. Hence, we ask: what are the sociocognitive principles which make language death hurtful and symbolic? Within this article, we attempt to outline a sociocognitive account of language death, situating the Hallidayan perspective of language as a “social-semiotic” system alongside a Cognitive Linguistic approach. We further contextualise language as inseparable from culture, drawing insight from the sociological thought of Bourdieu. We contend that language death entails psychological trauma, representing the destruction of cultural genealogy and the loss of knowledge intrinsic to personal self-imagery and identity. To this end, we present a case study of the Māori languaculture in Aotearoa (New Zealand), tracing the impact of colonialism and marginalisation to current efforts and ambitions to ensure the languacultural survival of Māori and reclaim space in Aotearoa as a respected knowledge system and means of expression, particularly in the socio-technical age of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Web. We argue that our analysis bodes practical implications for language maintenance and revitalisation, concluding that sociolinguistic practitioners should consider a socio-cognitivist as well as socio-technical paradigm for language intervention. In closing, we discuss leveraging AI technologies towards language heritage, archival, and preservation to limit the destructive impact of the death of a language.","PeriodicalId":52368,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Multilingualism","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Multilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Sociolinguists suggest language death entails significant cultural, personal, and ecological loss. Socio-cultural and socio-political factors exacerbate language erosion and encourage supplantation by another more dominant language. Hence, we ask: what are the sociocognitive principles which make language death hurtful and symbolic? Within this article, we attempt to outline a sociocognitive account of language death, situating the Hallidayan perspective of language as a “social-semiotic” system alongside a Cognitive Linguistic approach. We further contextualise language as inseparable from culture, drawing insight from the sociological thought of Bourdieu. We contend that language death entails psychological trauma, representing the destruction of cultural genealogy and the loss of knowledge intrinsic to personal self-imagery and identity. To this end, we present a case study of the Māori languaculture in Aotearoa (New Zealand), tracing the impact of colonialism and marginalisation to current efforts and ambitions to ensure the languacultural survival of Māori and reclaim space in Aotearoa as a respected knowledge system and means of expression, particularly in the socio-technical age of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Web. We argue that our analysis bodes practical implications for language maintenance and revitalisation, concluding that sociolinguistic practitioners should consider a socio-cognitivist as well as socio-technical paradigm for language intervention. In closing, we discuss leveraging AI technologies towards language heritage, archival, and preservation to limit the destructive impact of the death of a language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
濒危语言:人工智能时代语言死亡、身份丧失和保存的社会认知方法
社会语言学家认为,语言的消亡会带来重大的文化、个人和生态损失。社会文化和社会政治因素加剧了语言的侵蚀,并鼓励被另一种更占优势的语言取代。因此,我们要问:是什么社会认知原则使语言死亡具有伤害性和象征性?在本文中,我们试图概述一种语言死亡的社会认知解释,将哈利达扬的语言观点作为一种“社会符号学”系统与认知语言学方法相结合。我们进一步从布迪厄的社会学思想中汲取洞见,将语言置于与文化不可分割的语境中。我们认为,语言死亡带来心理创伤,代表着文化谱系的破坏和个人自我意象和身份固有知识的丧失。为此,我们提出了一个关于新西兰奥特罗阿Māori语言文化的案例研究,追踪殖民主义和边缘化对当前努力和雄心的影响,以确保Māori的语言生存,并在奥特罗阿重新获得空间,作为一种受人尊敬的知识体系和表达方式,特别是在人工智能(AI)和网络的社会技术时代。我们认为,我们的分析预示着语言维护和振兴的实际意义,结论是社会语言学从业者应该考虑语言干预的社会认知主义和社会技术范式。最后,我们讨论了将人工智能技术用于语言遗产、档案和保存,以限制语言死亡的破坏性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Multilingualism
Sustainable Multilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Linguistic and Cultural Mediation in Learning the Host Country’s Language Lip Synchrony of Bilabial Consonants in the Lithuanian Dubbed Live-Action Film a Dog's Way Home The Nomenclature of Traditional Ornaments in Latvian and Lithuanian Language Attitudes and Policy Preferences: Insights From International Scholarship Applicants to Hungarian Universities Translanguaging in Teaching and Learning of English at University Level: The Perspectives of Ukrainian Students and their Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1