Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being?

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Mobile Media & Communication Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1177/20501579211029326
Adrian Meier
{"title":"Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being?","authors":"Adrian Meier","doi":"10.1177/20501579211029326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most prior research on the effects of mobile and social media on well-being has worked from either the “technology addiction” or “screen time” approach. Yet these frameworks struggle with considerable conceptual and methodological limitations. The present study discusses and tests an established but understudied alternative, the technology habit approach. Instead of conflating mobile usage with problems (i.e., addictive/problematic usage) or ignoring users’ psychological engagement with mobiles (i.e., screen time), this approach investigates how person-level (habit strength) and day-level aspects of mobile habits (perceived interruptions and the urge to check) contribute to a key problem outcome, procrastination, as well as affective well-being and meaningfulness. In a five-day diary study with N = 532 student smartphone users providing N = 2,331 diary entries, mobile checking habit strength, perceived interruptions, and the urge to check together explained small to moderate amounts of procrastination. Procrastination, in turn, was linked to lower affective well-being and meaningfulness. Yet mobile habits showed only very small or no direct associations with affective well-being and meaningfulness. By separating habitual mobile connectivity from problem outcomes and well-being measures, this research demonstrates a promising alternative to the study of digital well-being.","PeriodicalId":46650,"journal":{"name":"Mobile Media & Communication","volume":"10 1","pages":"272 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile Media & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211029326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Most prior research on the effects of mobile and social media on well-being has worked from either the “technology addiction” or “screen time” approach. Yet these frameworks struggle with considerable conceptual and methodological limitations. The present study discusses and tests an established but understudied alternative, the technology habit approach. Instead of conflating mobile usage with problems (i.e., addictive/problematic usage) or ignoring users’ psychological engagement with mobiles (i.e., screen time), this approach investigates how person-level (habit strength) and day-level aspects of mobile habits (perceived interruptions and the urge to check) contribute to a key problem outcome, procrastination, as well as affective well-being and meaningfulness. In a five-day diary study with N = 532 student smartphone users providing N = 2,331 diary entries, mobile checking habit strength, perceived interruptions, and the urge to check together explained small to moderate amounts of procrastination. Procrastination, in turn, was linked to lower affective well-being and meaningfulness. Yet mobile habits showed only very small or no direct associations with affective well-being and meaningfulness. By separating habitual mobile connectivity from problem outcomes and well-being measures, this research demonstrates a promising alternative to the study of digital well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究问题,而不是问题用法:手机检查习惯会增加拖延症并降低幸福感吗?
大多数先前关于移动和社交媒体对幸福感影响的研究都是从“技术成瘾”或“屏幕时间”的方法进行的。然而,这些框架在概念和方法上都存在相当大的局限性。本研究讨论并测试了一种已建立但研究不足的替代方法,即技术习惯方法。这种方法没有将手机使用与问题(即成瘾/有问题的使用)混为一谈,也没有忽视用户对手机的心理参与(即屏幕时间),而是调查了个人层面(习惯强度)和日常层面的手机习惯(感知到的干扰和检查的冲动)是如何导致关键问题结果拖延的,以及情感上的幸福感和意义。在一项为期五天的日记研究中,有532名学生智能手机用户提供了2331条日记条目,手机检查习惯的强度、感知到的干扰以及一起检查的冲动解释了小到中等程度的拖延。拖延反过来又与情感幸福感和意义感的降低有关。然而,移动习惯与情感幸福感和意义只有很小的联系,甚至没有直接联系。通过将习惯性的移动连接与问题结果和幸福感指标相分离,这项研究证明了数字幸福感研究的一个有前景的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
16.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Mobile Media & Communication is a peer-reviewed forum for international, interdisciplinary academic research on the dynamic field of mobile media and communication. Mobile Media & Communication draws on a wide and continually renewed range of disciplines, engaging broadly in the concept of mobility itself.
期刊最新文献
How do smartphone users access the internet? An exploratory analysis of mobile web browser use Eco-Warrior: A theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits Off-grid? Resistant media operations by delivery gig workers in response to app-based tracking Ear buddies: A moderated mediation model of the effect of mobility on parasocial relationships with podcast hosts Sharing is caring: The positive role of smartphone co-use in social dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1