Bringing labour market flexibilization under control? Marginal work and collective regulation in the creative industries in the Netherlands

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR European Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1177/09596801221127109
W. Been, M. Keune
{"title":"Bringing labour market flexibilization under control? Marginal work and collective regulation in the creative industries in the Netherlands","authors":"W. Been, M. Keune","doi":"10.1177/09596801221127109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cultural and creative industries (CCI) is a sector where the workforce is highly educated, yet precarious working conditions are prominent. Although flexible and marginal work is often treated as an overall feature of the sector, this study based on register data on all workers in the sector shows that processes of flexibilization and marginalization are highly divergent between its subsectors. In half of the CCI subsectors, some form of collectively bargained response to the ongoing flexibilization and marginalization has emerged. This first of all shows that creative workers do indeed not only care about expressing their creativity but also about their material working and living conditions. Also how employers’ organizations and trade unions respond to these developments by means of collective agreements varies. Where they disagree, concrete action is postponed. Where they align, either counteracting measures are included, or attempts are made to bridge the divide between employees and the self-employed to some extend in the collective agreement. By doing so, they counteract processes of dualization, paving the road for innovative approaches of industrial relations actors. Still, this counts only for part of the CCI as much of it remains not covered by collective agreements.","PeriodicalId":47034,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801221127109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cultural and creative industries (CCI) is a sector where the workforce is highly educated, yet precarious working conditions are prominent. Although flexible and marginal work is often treated as an overall feature of the sector, this study based on register data on all workers in the sector shows that processes of flexibilization and marginalization are highly divergent between its subsectors. In half of the CCI subsectors, some form of collectively bargained response to the ongoing flexibilization and marginalization has emerged. This first of all shows that creative workers do indeed not only care about expressing their creativity but also about their material working and living conditions. Also how employers’ organizations and trade unions respond to these developments by means of collective agreements varies. Where they disagree, concrete action is postponed. Where they align, either counteracting measures are included, or attempts are made to bridge the divide between employees and the self-employed to some extend in the collective agreement. By doing so, they counteract processes of dualization, paving the road for innovative approaches of industrial relations actors. Still, this counts only for part of the CCI as much of it remains not covered by collective agreements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制劳动力市场的灵活性?荷兰创意产业的边际工作与集体监管
文化和创意产业是一个劳动力受过高等教育,但工作条件不稳定的行业。尽管灵活和边缘化的工作通常被视为该部门的一个整体特征,但这项基于该部门所有工人登记数据的研究表明,各部门之间的灵活化和边缘化进程差异很大。在半数CCI分部门中,出现了某种形式的集体讨价还价的应对措施,以应对正在进行的灵活性和边缘化。这首先表明,创造性工作者确实不仅关心表达他们的创造力,而且关心他们的物质工作和生活条件。雇主组织和工会如何通过集体协议应对这些发展也各不相同。如果他们意见不一,具体行动就会被推迟。在他们一致的地方,要么包括对抗措施,要么在集体协议中试图在一定程度上弥合雇员和个体经营者之间的分歧。通过这样做,他们抵消了二元化的过程,为劳资关系参与者的创新方法铺平了道路。尽管如此,这只是CCI的一部分,因为其中大部分仍不在集体协议的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Industrial Relations
European Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: It embraces a broad definition of industrial relations and includes articles which relate to any aspect of work and employment. It publishes rigorous and innovative work on and from all European countries, from the Atlantic to the Urals. All social science disciplines are relevant to its remit, and interdisciplinary approaches are particulary encouraged. A major objective is to foster cross-national comparative analysis; and in this context, work which relates European developments to broader global experience is welcome.
期刊最新文献
Job quality and institutional investors: Evidence in 17 OECD countries, 1993-2017 Job mobility, reallocation and wage growth: A tale of two countries Changing labour migration flows after Brexit: An analysis of UK survey and administrative data Job tenure in Western Europe, 1993–2021: Decline or stability? Strategic labour inspection in fissured workplaces and transnational employment relations: Lessons from co-enforcement approaches and transgovernmental cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1