Iván Garzón Vallejo, Diana María Ramírez Sarmiento
{"title":"Guerra Fría en las aulas","authors":"Iván Garzón Vallejo, Diana María Ramírez Sarmiento","doi":"10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aimed to identify the existence of a canon of authors, schools and subjects in the teaching of contemporary political theory in the undergraduate programs of Political Sciences currently taught in Colombia. From this canon it was formulated a diagnosis of the main approaches and theories in the teaching of contemporary political theory, taking as analysis criteria the way that the canon resolve four epistemological tensions in the sub-discipline: monism vs. pluralism, local vs. global, modernity vs. post-modernity, and disciplinary vs. interdisciplinary. This analysis allowed to conclude that the canon is characterized by a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, local, and modern perspective, and demonstrates a process of redefinition of its problematic borders as well as a relatively refractory spirit to the influx of the Anglo-Saxon political theory.","PeriodicalId":30087,"journal":{"name":"Civilizar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civilizar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22518/JOUR.CCSH/2020.2A05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper aimed to identify the existence of a canon of authors, schools and subjects in the teaching of contemporary political theory in the undergraduate programs of Political Sciences currently taught in Colombia. From this canon it was formulated a diagnosis of the main approaches and theories in the teaching of contemporary political theory, taking as analysis criteria the way that the canon resolve four epistemological tensions in the sub-discipline: monism vs. pluralism, local vs. global, modernity vs. post-modernity, and disciplinary vs. interdisciplinary. This analysis allowed to conclude that the canon is characterized by a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, local, and modern perspective, and demonstrates a process of redefinition of its problematic borders as well as a relatively refractory spirit to the influx of the Anglo-Saxon political theory.