Bias in artificial intelligence in vascular surgery

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.07.003
Zachary Tran , Julianne Byun , Ha Yeon Lee , Hans Boggs , Emma Y. Tomihama , Sharon C. Kiang
{"title":"Bias in artificial intelligence in vascular surgery","authors":"Zachary Tran ,&nbsp;Julianne Byun ,&nbsp;Ha Yeon Lee ,&nbsp;Hans Boggs ,&nbsp;Emma Y. Tomihama ,&nbsp;Sharon C. Kiang","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Application of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the utilization of big data, especially in patient care. The potential of deep learning models to learn without </span><em>a priori</em><span> assumption, or without prior learning, to connect seemingly unrelated information mixes excitement alongside hesitation to fully understand AI's limitations. Bias, ranging from data collection and input to algorithm development to finally human review of algorithm output affects AI's application to clinical patient presents unique challenges that differ significantly from biases in traditional analyses. Algorithm fairness, a new field of research within AI, aims to mitigate bias by evaluating the data at the preprocessing stage, optimizing during algorithm development, and evaluating algorithm output at the postprocessing stage. As the field continues to develop, being cognizant of the inherent biases and limitations related to black box decision making, biased data sets agnostic to patient-level disparities, wide variation of present methodologies, and lack of common reporting standards will require ongoing research to provide transparency to AI and its applications.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796723000558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Application of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the utilization of big data, especially in patient care. The potential of deep learning models to learn without a priori assumption, or without prior learning, to connect seemingly unrelated information mixes excitement alongside hesitation to fully understand AI's limitations. Bias, ranging from data collection and input to algorithm development to finally human review of algorithm output affects AI's application to clinical patient presents unique challenges that differ significantly from biases in traditional analyses. Algorithm fairness, a new field of research within AI, aims to mitigate bias by evaluating the data at the preprocessing stage, optimizing during algorithm development, and evaluating algorithm output at the postprocessing stage. As the field continues to develop, being cognizant of the inherent biases and limitations related to black box decision making, biased data sets agnostic to patient-level disparities, wide variation of present methodologies, and lack of common reporting standards will require ongoing research to provide transparency to AI and its applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管外科人工智能中的偏见
人工智能(AI)的应用彻底改变了大数据的利用,特别是在患者护理方面。深度学习模型在没有先验假设或事先学习的情况下进行学习的潜力,将看似不相关的信息联系起来,这让人既兴奋又犹豫,以充分理解人工智能的局限性。从数据收集和输入到算法开发,再到最终对算法输出的人类审查,都会影响人工智能在临床患者中的应用,这带来了独特的挑战,与传统分析中的偏见有很大不同。算法公平性是人工智能领域的一个新研究领域,旨在通过在预处理阶段评估数据,在算法开发过程中优化,以及在后处理阶段评估算法输出来减轻偏见。随着该领域的不断发展,认识到与黑盒决策相关的固有偏见和局限性、与患者水平差异不相关的有偏见的数据集、现有方法的广泛差异以及缺乏共同的报告标准,将需要持续的研究来为人工智能及其应用提供透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1