Centralization and regionalization of minimum wages: Evidence from Russia

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-86-104
A. Lukyanova
{"title":"Centralization and regionalization of minimum wages: Evidence from Russia","authors":"A. Lukyanova","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-86-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates recent developments in the minimum wage policy in Russia. We focus on the effects of two interventions: (1) the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of December 7, 2017 to exclude mandatory regional compensation payments and Northern allowances from the minimum wage; (2) the decision to equate the national minimum wage with the subsistence level through two hikes in early 2018. Our empirical analysis is based on the data for 2016Q1—2022Q1, covering the period before and after the interventions. The decision of the Constitutional Court introduced an additional tier of minimum wage setting. Formerly, minimum wages were regionalized in a decentralizedway via tripartite collective bargaining at the regional level. Since 2018, this approach has been supplemented with the centralized regionalization via mandatory regional coefficients. The decision to equate the minimum wage with the subsistence level also contributed to the increase in centralization as it reduced the room the social partners to set regional minima above the federal level. As a result, the regionalization via regional tripartite agreements has basically ceased to exist, although before 2018 it showed a decent ability to adapt to local conditions. Policy developments in 2017—2018 reduced the interregional variation in the bindingness and purchasingpower of minimum wages. However, it might have happened at the expense of economically weak regions. In poor regions, the ratio of the minimum wage to the average wage has exceeded 50%, which exacerbates the risks of disemployment and welfare losses in those regions.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-86-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper investigates recent developments in the minimum wage policy in Russia. We focus on the effects of two interventions: (1) the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of December 7, 2017 to exclude mandatory regional compensation payments and Northern allowances from the minimum wage; (2) the decision to equate the national minimum wage with the subsistence level through two hikes in early 2018. Our empirical analysis is based on the data for 2016Q1—2022Q1, covering the period before and after the interventions. The decision of the Constitutional Court introduced an additional tier of minimum wage setting. Formerly, minimum wages were regionalized in a decentralizedway via tripartite collective bargaining at the regional level. Since 2018, this approach has been supplemented with the centralized regionalization via mandatory regional coefficients. The decision to equate the minimum wage with the subsistence level also contributed to the increase in centralization as it reduced the room the social partners to set regional minima above the federal level. As a result, the regionalization via regional tripartite agreements has basically ceased to exist, although before 2018 it showed a decent ability to adapt to local conditions. Policy developments in 2017—2018 reduced the interregional variation in the bindingness and purchasingpower of minimum wages. However, it might have happened at the expense of economically weak regions. In poor regions, the ratio of the minimum wage to the average wage has exceeded 50%, which exacerbates the risks of disemployment and welfare losses in those regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最低工资的集中化和区域化:来自俄罗斯的证据
本文调查了俄罗斯最低工资政策的最新发展。我们重点关注两项干预措施的影响:(1)2017年12月7日俄罗斯宪法法院决定将强制性地区补偿金和北方津贴从最低工资中排除;(2) 2018年初通过两次上调,决定将全国最低工资与最低生活水平挂钩。我们的实证分析基于2016Q1-2022Q1的数据,涵盖了干预前后的时间段。宪法法院的决定增加了最低工资标准。以前,最低工资是通过区域一级的三方集体谈判,以一种分散的方式进行区域化的。自2018年以来,该方法被强制性区域系数集中化区划所补充。将最低工资与生活水平等同起来的决定也助长了集中化,因为它减少了社会伙伴在联邦水平之上设定区域最低工资的空间。因此,通过区域三方协议进行的区域化基本上已经不复存在,尽管在2018年之前它表现出了不错的因地制宜的能力。2017-2018年的政策发展减少了最低工资约束力和购买力的地区间差异。然而,这可能是以经济薄弱地区为代价的。在贫困地区,最低工资与平均工资的比例已经超过50%,这加剧了这些地区失业和福利损失的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Determinants of public spending composition in the Russian regions Soaring public debt: Return of financial repression and high inflation? Knowledge-based view of the firm and the phenomenon of knowledge encapsulation Economic education as a mirror of interdisciplinary discourse Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1