Édipo, Tirania e Verdade

Alberto Pucheu
{"title":"Édipo, Tirania e Verdade","authors":"Alberto Pucheu","doi":"10.5007/2176-8552.2018N26P7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Oedipus the King, there is a scene that has already been said to be the caesura, the antirhythmic in the rhythm, the incalculable in the calculation: that of the tyrant with Tiresias. As the seer is said to be the one in whom “[...] only/ the unveiling is infused: Aletheia”, I read this scene as a scene from aletheia, as a scene in which aletheia is enacted. Certainly, it is a scene analogous to what is told of the relationship between Oedipus and the Sphinx, in which the Sphinx protects the enigmatic, while the other one believes in deciphering the enigmatic. If Oedipus is, as he says, the investigator of all speeches, how does he behave in relation to that which, in language, as aletheia, is what matters most? Likewise, how does Tiresias behave? While, in his position in front of the truth, Oedipus assumes a position of tyranny, in Tiresias, aletheia and aporia overlap, making us think, if we still need to use the name, in an aporetic “truth” like the one that poetically matters. Thus, there would be a double paradigm in the respective tragedy regarding the way of thinking the truth: one to be avoided, that of Oedipus; another one, to be followed, that of Tiresias. Keywords: Oedipus; tyranny; truth; Tiresias; aporia","PeriodicalId":31415,"journal":{"name":"Outra Travessia","volume":"2 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outra Travessia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2176-8552.2018N26P7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Oedipus the King, there is a scene that has already been said to be the caesura, the antirhythmic in the rhythm, the incalculable in the calculation: that of the tyrant with Tiresias. As the seer is said to be the one in whom “[...] only/ the unveiling is infused: Aletheia”, I read this scene as a scene from aletheia, as a scene in which aletheia is enacted. Certainly, it is a scene analogous to what is told of the relationship between Oedipus and the Sphinx, in which the Sphinx protects the enigmatic, while the other one believes in deciphering the enigmatic. If Oedipus is, as he says, the investigator of all speeches, how does he behave in relation to that which, in language, as aletheia, is what matters most? Likewise, how does Tiresias behave? While, in his position in front of the truth, Oedipus assumes a position of tyranny, in Tiresias, aletheia and aporia overlap, making us think, if we still need to use the name, in an aporetic “truth” like the one that poetically matters. Thus, there would be a double paradigm in the respective tragedy regarding the way of thinking the truth: one to be avoided, that of Oedipus; another one, to be followed, that of Tiresias. Keywords: Oedipus; tyranny; truth; Tiresias; aporia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄狄浦斯、暴政与真理
在《俄狄浦斯之王》中,有一个场景已经被认为是凯撒,节奏中的反节奏,计算中的不可估量:暴君与蒂瑞西亚斯的场景。由于先知据说是“[…]只有/揭幕被注入:阿莱西亚”的人,我把这一幕读作阿莱西亚的一幕,作为阿莱西亚被上演的一幕。当然,这是一个类似于俄狄浦斯和斯芬克斯之间关系的场景,在这个场景中,斯芬克斯保护神秘的人,而另一个相信破译神秘的人。如果俄狄浦斯,正如他所说,是所有言论的调查员,那么在语言中,作为aletheia,他是如何表现的呢?同样,蒂瑞西亚人的行为如何?虽然在真理面前,俄狄浦斯采取了暴政的立场,但在《蒂瑞西亚》中,aletheia和aporia重叠,这让我们思考,如果我们还需要使用这个名字的话,在一个狂热的“真理”中,就像诗歌中重要的一样。因此,在各自的悲剧中,关于思考真理的方式,会有一个双重范式:一个需要避免的范式,俄狄浦斯的范式;另一个是蒂瑞西亚斯的。关键词:俄狄浦斯;暴政真相蒂瑞西亚斯;意义死角
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Esparsos: a obra inédita de Cecília Meireles O salto do touro: a mitopoesia de O risco do bordado, de Autran Dourado A expressividade na obra neorrealista de Júlio Pomar: uma apresentação deformadamente grotesca Marguerite Duras, a escrita e a experiência Ascensão e ruína na era do ímpeto modernizante: uma leitura comparativa de São Bernardo, de Graciliano Ramos, e Absalão, Absalão!, de William Faulkner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1