Do Labour Standards Improve Employment Relationships in Global Production Networks? A Cross-sector Study in Brazil

IF 1.3 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Global Labour Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.15173/glj.v14i2.5088
Jean-Christophe Graz, Patrícia Rocha Lemos, Andréia Galvão
{"title":"Do Labour Standards Improve Employment Relationships in Global Production Networks? A Cross-sector Study in Brazil","authors":"Jean-Christophe Graz, Patrícia Rocha Lemos, Andréia Galvão","doi":"10.15173/glj.v14i2.5088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on private regulation of labour standards in global production networks often highlights their continuing failure despite the fact that lead firms no longer consider them as mere window dressing. Fewer analyses delve into their on-the-ground effectiveness to benefit workers. This article joins a context-specific approach with quantitative analysis to examine whether labour standards used in private regulation improve employment relationships in suppliers of global production networks. Based on a single-country case study of Brazil, we look at the extent of their adoption by suppliers across sectors, their complementarity with national labour institutions, and whether the adoption of labour standards at supplier site level is likely to support labour agency. Our findings show little effectiveness of labour standards against those dimensions. The presence of labour standards at supplier level alone has no significant impact and varies greatly across sectors. It is only if workers are aware of the presence of such standards that it might support their agency when union membership is taken as proxy. Yet, the correlation could also be the other way round: awareness of labour standards depend on being a member of a union in the first place. \nKEYWORDS: private regulation; certification; labour standards; corporate social responsibility (CSR); global production networks","PeriodicalId":44737,"journal":{"name":"Global Labour Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Labour Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v14i2.5088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on private regulation of labour standards in global production networks often highlights their continuing failure despite the fact that lead firms no longer consider them as mere window dressing. Fewer analyses delve into their on-the-ground effectiveness to benefit workers. This article joins a context-specific approach with quantitative analysis to examine whether labour standards used in private regulation improve employment relationships in suppliers of global production networks. Based on a single-country case study of Brazil, we look at the extent of their adoption by suppliers across sectors, their complementarity with national labour institutions, and whether the adoption of labour standards at supplier site level is likely to support labour agency. Our findings show little effectiveness of labour standards against those dimensions. The presence of labour standards at supplier level alone has no significant impact and varies greatly across sectors. It is only if workers are aware of the presence of such standards that it might support their agency when union membership is taken as proxy. Yet, the correlation could also be the other way round: awareness of labour standards depend on being a member of a union in the first place.  KEYWORDS: private regulation; certification; labour standards; corporate social responsibility (CSR); global production networks
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动标准能改善全球生产网络中的就业关系吗?巴西跨部门研究
对全球生产网络中劳工标准的私人监管的研究往往强调了它们的持续失败,尽管领先的公司不再认为它们只是粉饰门面。很少有分析深入研究它们对工人的实际效益。本文结合具体情况的方法和定量分析,研究私人监管中使用的劳工标准是否改善了全球生产网络供应商的就业关系。基于对巴西的单一国家案例研究,我们考察了各部门供应商采用这些标准的程度,它们与国家劳工机构的互补性,以及在供应商现场采用劳工标准是否有可能支持劳工机构。我们的研究结果表明,劳工标准在这些方面的有效性很低。仅在供应商层面存在的劳工标准没有重大影响,而且各部门差异很大。只有当工人们意识到这些标准的存在时,当工会成员被视为代理人时,它才可能支持他们的机构。然而,这种相关性也可能是相反的:对劳工标准的认识首先取决于是否是工会的一员。关键词:私人监管;证明劳动标准;企业社会责任;全球生产网络
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Labour Journal
Global Labour Journal INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Eli Friedman (2022) The Urbanization of People: The Politics of Development, Labor Markets, and Schooling in the Chinese City. Labour institutions and the dynamic production of informality: collective organisation of hard-to-reach workers in Tanzania Building Autonomous Power: Solidarity Networks in Precarious Times Labor Contestation at Walmart Brazil: Limits of Global Diffusion in Latin America Breaking the impasse: Reflections on university worker organising in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1