Julia E. Rager , Celeste Carberry , Rebecca C. Fry
{"title":"Use of genome editing tools in environmental health research","authors":"Julia E. Rager , Celeste Carberry , Rebecca C. Fry","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nature and type of genome editing tools are rapidly expanding and becoming increasingly incorporated into research efforts aimed at understanding human disease. The majority of research involving genome editing has been driven by medical research, with a limited but increasing number of studies currently published in the field of environmental health and toxicology. The aim of the review is to address this research gap by providing a high-level summary of current genome editing techniques and presenting examples of how some of these techniques have been used toxicologically to evaluate environmental exposure–induced disease. Specific strategies surrounding the evaluation of hazardous chemicals, chemical mechanism of action/adverse outcome pathways, and interindividual response variability are also discussed to aid in the translation of genome editing methods toward toxicological and environmental health research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.02.007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246820201930004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The nature and type of genome editing tools are rapidly expanding and becoming increasingly incorporated into research efforts aimed at understanding human disease. The majority of research involving genome editing has been driven by medical research, with a limited but increasing number of studies currently published in the field of environmental health and toxicology. The aim of the review is to address this research gap by providing a high-level summary of current genome editing techniques and presenting examples of how some of these techniques have been used toxicologically to evaluate environmental exposure–induced disease. Specific strategies surrounding the evaluation of hazardous chemicals, chemical mechanism of action/adverse outcome pathways, and interindividual response variability are also discussed to aid in the translation of genome editing methods toward toxicological and environmental health research.
期刊介绍:
The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.