Systematically identifying communication deficits in youth under psychiatric care through a self-report scale

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.2174/2210676613666221021113633
Nagy Lr, U. A, Petti Ta
{"title":"Systematically identifying communication deficits in youth under psychiatric care through a self-report scale","authors":"Nagy Lr, U. A, Petti Ta","doi":"10.2174/2210676613666221021113633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCommunication disorders are associated with psychopathology and social distress in adolescents, yet moderate or less severe deficits often go undiagnosed. Data from a quality improvement initiative was analyzed from the Communication Perception Estimate Scale (CoPES), a self-report scale for receptive-expressive and pragmatic language deficits in youth receiving mental health services.\n\n\n\nTo identify the frequency of communication deficits (CDs) among youth in psychiatric care and identify patterns of self-reported symptoms. The scale may be used as a clinical screening tool for Language disorder and Social (Pragmatic) communication disorder.\n\n\n\nCoPES is a 31-item scale administered to 318 adolescents 11-18 years old, asking questions about receptive-expressive and pragmatic CDs. In the first 12 items, subjects identified frequency of communication disorder symptoms using a forced-choice scale; in the following items frustration with CDs and then yes or no for earlier intervention and current interest in getting help for CDs. Respondents are from five representative clinical services.\n\n\n\nPatients were divided into self-identified groups: 14.5% significant Receptive-Expressive deficits only (R-ED); 6.6% significant Pragmatic deficits only (PD); 29.9% Both significant Receptive-Expressive and Pragmatic deficits (BCD); and 49.1% with limited or no deficits (NCD). The R-ED group expressed high rates of frustration and requests for help with Receptive-Expressive deficits. The PD group reported elevated rates of frustration in both areas. The BCD group indicated significantly more frustration and requests for help with both language areas compared to the NCD group.\n\n\n\nThis data supports the need for greater awareness and consideration of communication disorders in youth presenting for psychiatric care.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676613666221021113633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication disorders are associated with psychopathology and social distress in adolescents, yet moderate or less severe deficits often go undiagnosed. Data from a quality improvement initiative was analyzed from the Communication Perception Estimate Scale (CoPES), a self-report scale for receptive-expressive and pragmatic language deficits in youth receiving mental health services. To identify the frequency of communication deficits (CDs) among youth in psychiatric care and identify patterns of self-reported symptoms. The scale may be used as a clinical screening tool for Language disorder and Social (Pragmatic) communication disorder. CoPES is a 31-item scale administered to 318 adolescents 11-18 years old, asking questions about receptive-expressive and pragmatic CDs. In the first 12 items, subjects identified frequency of communication disorder symptoms using a forced-choice scale; in the following items frustration with CDs and then yes or no for earlier intervention and current interest in getting help for CDs. Respondents are from five representative clinical services. Patients were divided into self-identified groups: 14.5% significant Receptive-Expressive deficits only (R-ED); 6.6% significant Pragmatic deficits only (PD); 29.9% Both significant Receptive-Expressive and Pragmatic deficits (BCD); and 49.1% with limited or no deficits (NCD). The R-ED group expressed high rates of frustration and requests for help with Receptive-Expressive deficits. The PD group reported elevated rates of frustration in both areas. The BCD group indicated significantly more frustration and requests for help with both language areas compared to the NCD group. This data supports the need for greater awareness and consideration of communication disorders in youth presenting for psychiatric care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过自我报告量表系统地识别精神科护理青少年的沟通缺陷
沟通障碍与青少年的精神病理和社会困扰有关,但中度或较轻的缺陷往往未被诊断出来。来自质量改进计划的数据分析来自沟通感知评估量表(CoPES),这是一种接受心理健康服务的青少年接受表达和语用语言缺陷的自我报告量表。确定青少年在精神科护理中的沟通缺陷(cd)的频率,并确定自我报告症状的模式。该量表可作为语言障碍和社会(语用)交际障碍的临床筛查工具。CoPES是一个31项的量表,对318名11-18岁的青少年进行调查,询问有关cd的接受-表达和语用性的问题。在前12个项目中,被试使用强迫选择量表识别沟通障碍症状的频率;在以下项目中对cd的挫败感,然后对早期干预和当前对获得cd帮助的兴趣是或否。受访者来自五个具有代表性的临床服务机构。患者分为自我识别组:14.5%仅存在显著的接受表达缺陷(R-ED);6.6%的显著语用缺陷(PD);29.9%具有显著的接受-表达和语用缺陷;49.1%有有限或无缺陷(NCD)。R-ED组在接受-表达缺陷方面表现出很高的挫败感和求助率。PD组在这两个方面的挫败感都有所上升。与NCD组相比,BCD组在两种语言领域都表现出更多的挫折和帮助请求。这一数据支持需要更多的认识和考虑的沟通障碍的青少年呈现精神护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Psychiatry
Adolescent Psychiatry PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
ADHD Symptoms Among Adolescents: Factor Structure Based on Mother and Adolescent Self-Ratings Social Media and Fear of Missing Out: An Exploration of the Role of Mindfulness, Cognitive Biases and Need to Belong in Chinese College Students A Brief Review of Flourishing Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Mood and Anxiety Disorders Impact of Changing Cannabis Laws on Cannabis Use Disorders, Serious Mental Illness, and Mortality Outcomes in US Youth: A Narrative Review Effects of Cannabidiol in Adolescent and Young Adult Depressive and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Preclinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1