Do 12-month-old infants maintain expectations of contingent or non-contingent responding based on prior experiences with unfamiliar and familiar adults?

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Interaction Studies Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.1075/is.18044.ste
Gunilla Stenberg
{"title":"Do 12-month-old infants maintain expectations of contingent or non-contingent responding based on prior experiences\n with unfamiliar and familiar adults?","authors":"Gunilla Stenberg","doi":"10.1075/is.18044.ste","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current study examined whether infants use previous encounters for maintaining expectations for adults’\n contingent responding. An unfamiliar adult responded contingently or non-contingently to infant signaling during an initial play\n situation and 10 min later presented an ambiguous toy while providing positive information (Experiment 1; forty-two\n 12-month-olds). The infants in the contingent group looked more at the adult during toy presentation and played more with the toy\n during the concluding free-play situation than the infants in the non-contingent group. When the parent had responded contingently\n or non-contingently to infant bids (Experiment 2; forty 12-month-olds), the infants in the contingent group tended to look more at\n the parent and tended to play more with the toy than did the infants in the non-contingent group. The results indicate that from\n just a brief exposure, infants form expectations about adults’ responsiveness and maintain these expectations of\n contingent/non-contingent responding from one situation to another.","PeriodicalId":46494,"journal":{"name":"Interaction Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interaction Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18044.ste","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examined whether infants use previous encounters for maintaining expectations for adults’ contingent responding. An unfamiliar adult responded contingently or non-contingently to infant signaling during an initial play situation and 10 min later presented an ambiguous toy while providing positive information (Experiment 1; forty-two 12-month-olds). The infants in the contingent group looked more at the adult during toy presentation and played more with the toy during the concluding free-play situation than the infants in the non-contingent group. When the parent had responded contingently or non-contingently to infant bids (Experiment 2; forty 12-month-olds), the infants in the contingent group tended to look more at the parent and tended to play more with the toy than did the infants in the non-contingent group. The results indicate that from just a brief exposure, infants form expectations about adults’ responsiveness and maintain these expectations of contingent/non-contingent responding from one situation to another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
12个月大的婴儿是否会根据先前对不熟悉和熟悉的成年人的经验,保持对偶然或非偶然反应的期望?
目前的研究调查了婴儿是否利用以前的遭遇来维持对成年人偶然反应的期望。一个不熟悉的成年人在最初的游戏情境中对婴儿的信号作出偶然或非偶然的反应,10分钟后在提供积极信息的同时呈现一个模棱两可的玩具(实验1;42起来)。与非偶然组的婴儿相比,偶然组的婴儿在玩具展示过程中更多地看向成人,在结束的自由游戏情境中更多地玩玩具。当父母对婴儿的出价作出偶然或非偶然的反应时(实验2;40个12个月大的婴儿),偶然性组的婴儿比非偶然性组的婴儿更倾向于看父母,更倾向于玩玩具。结果表明,仅仅从短暂的接触中,婴儿就形成了对成人反应性的期望,并在一种情况下对另一种情况保持这种偶然/非偶然反应的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: This international peer-reviewed journal aims to advance knowledge in the growing and strongly interdisciplinary area of Interaction Studies in biological and artificial systems. Understanding social behaviour and communication in biological and artificial systems requires knowledge of evolutionary, developmental and neurobiological aspects of social behaviour and communication; the embodied nature of interactions; origins and characteristics of social and narrative intelligence; perception, action and communication in the context of dynamic and social environments; social learning.
期刊最新文献
Coordination between vehicles in traffic A matter of consequences Infants’ imitative learning from third-party observations Dog talk Texting!!!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1