Effect of radiological grade of cochlear ossification on cochlear implant outcome in postmeningitis deafness

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_138_20
F. Alzhrani, H. Alassiry, I. Alorainy, F. Albadr, Yassin Abdulsamad, Ahmad Aldhaferi
{"title":"Effect of radiological grade of cochlear ossification on cochlear implant outcome in postmeningitis deafness","authors":"F. Alzhrani, H. Alassiry, I. Alorainy, F. Albadr, Yassin Abdulsamad, Ahmad Aldhaferi","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_138_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Cochlear implantation provides significant benefits to patients with postmeningitis deafness; however, the prediction of the outcome is difficult. Therefore, the goal was to investigate whether there is a correlation between cochlear implantation outcome in postmeningitis deafness and the radiological grade of cochlear ossification. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 2013 and December 2017, nine patients with 14 diseased ears were included. All patients with postmeningitis deafness who had cochlear ossification and underwent cochlear implantation were included. Patients' demographic data and postoperative audiological outcome were recorded. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists and graded for cochlear ossification. The correlation between the preoperative radiological grade of cochlear ossification and postcochlear implant audiological outcome was examined. Results: The mean duration of deafness before implantation was 6.5 months, and the average PTA4k for all included ears was 28.9 dB. The average speech reception threshold was 22.5 dB. There was no significant difference in the audiological outcome between the different radiological degrees of cochlear ossification using either MRI or CT. Conclusion: The present study showed that the radiological degree of cochlear ossification postmeningitis is not a useful predictor of the audiological outcome postcochlear implant. However, the small sample size remains a major limitation of the current study.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"40 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_138_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cochlear implantation provides significant benefits to patients with postmeningitis deafness; however, the prediction of the outcome is difficult. Therefore, the goal was to investigate whether there is a correlation between cochlear implantation outcome in postmeningitis deafness and the radiological grade of cochlear ossification. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 2013 and December 2017, nine patients with 14 diseased ears were included. All patients with postmeningitis deafness who had cochlear ossification and underwent cochlear implantation were included. Patients' demographic data and postoperative audiological outcome were recorded. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists and graded for cochlear ossification. The correlation between the preoperative radiological grade of cochlear ossification and postcochlear implant audiological outcome was examined. Results: The mean duration of deafness before implantation was 6.5 months, and the average PTA4k for all included ears was 28.9 dB. The average speech reception threshold was 22.5 dB. There was no significant difference in the audiological outcome between the different radiological degrees of cochlear ossification using either MRI or CT. Conclusion: The present study showed that the radiological degree of cochlear ossification postmeningitis is not a useful predictor of the audiological outcome postcochlear implant. However, the small sample size remains a major limitation of the current study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑膜炎后耳聋耳蜗骨化的放射学分级对人工耳蜗植入效果的影响
目的:人工耳蜗植入术对脑膜炎后耳聋患者有显著的疗效;然而,结果的预测是困难的。因此,目的是研究脑膜炎后耳聋的耳蜗植入结果与耳蜗骨化的放射学分级之间是否存在相关性。方法:在这项2013年1月至2017年12月在沙特阿拉伯利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院进行的回顾性队列研究中,纳入了9名患者,14只患病耳朵。所有脑膜炎后耳聋的患者都有耳蜗骨化并接受了人工耳蜗植入。记录患者的人口统计学数据和术后听力学结果。两名神经放射科医生对术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)结果进行了独立审查,并对耳蜗骨化进行了分级。研究了术前耳蜗骨化的放射学分级与耳蜗植入后听力学结果之间的相关性。结果:植入前耳聋的平均持续时间为6.5个月,所有入选耳朵的平均PTA4k为28.9dB。平均语音接收阈值为22.5dB。结论:本研究表明,脑膜炎后耳蜗骨化的放射学程度并不能有效预测人工耳蜗植入后的听力学结果。然而,小样本量仍然是当前研究的一个主要限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Menstrual Cycle Changes after the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Cross-sectional Study in Saudi Arabia The Use of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as a Novel Combination for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Recurrent Complicated Abdominal Sarcoma: Case Report and Review of Literature Faculty Experiences: Virtual versus Traditional Problem-based Learning during COVID-19 in a Saudi Medical College CD4+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-treated Invasive Breast Cancer of No Special Type Evaluating the Novel Use of Unmanned Video Objective Structured Clinical Examination Stations in Pediatric Resident Training: Results and Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1