A Comparison of Biaxial Bending Strength of Thin Silicon Dies in the BoR and PoEF Tests

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Journal of Electronic Packaging Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1115/1.4056717
M. Tsai, T. Kuo
{"title":"A Comparison of Biaxial Bending Strength of Thin Silicon Dies in the BoR and PoEF Tests","authors":"M. Tsai, T. Kuo","doi":"10.1115/1.4056717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper aims to demonstrate the biaxial bending strength test on thin silicon dies using the classic ball-on-ring (BoR) test, and discuss it in detail by comparing those results with the newly-proposed point load on elastic foundation (PoEF) test. The geometric linear and nonlinear solutions to the BoR test are reviewed and also provided with theoretical and numerical formulations, respectively. Three different thicknesses (t = 42 μm, 57 μm and 82 μm) of the thin silicon dies (with a size of 10 mm × 10 mm) are tested in the BoR test, and their bending strengths, load-displacement curves and failure modes are presented and thoroughly discussed with a comparison of the published data from the PoEF test. It is found that, for the bending strengths of 57 μm and 82 μm-thick dies, the data from both the BoR and PoEF tests are very consistent, but not for 42 μm-thick dies with a relatively lower value in the BoR test. This lower strength value in the BoR test is attributed to the more pronounced local buckling effect than the PoEF test. Based on that, it can concluded that the PoEF test is better and more reliable than the conventional BoR as for testing the ultra-thin silicon dies, even though both tests are identical for the regularly thin dies.","PeriodicalId":15663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Packaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate the biaxial bending strength test on thin silicon dies using the classic ball-on-ring (BoR) test, and discuss it in detail by comparing those results with the newly-proposed point load on elastic foundation (PoEF) test. The geometric linear and nonlinear solutions to the BoR test are reviewed and also provided with theoretical and numerical formulations, respectively. Three different thicknesses (t = 42 μm, 57 μm and 82 μm) of the thin silicon dies (with a size of 10 mm × 10 mm) are tested in the BoR test, and their bending strengths, load-displacement curves and failure modes are presented and thoroughly discussed with a comparison of the published data from the PoEF test. It is found that, for the bending strengths of 57 μm and 82 μm-thick dies, the data from both the BoR and PoEF tests are very consistent, but not for 42 μm-thick dies with a relatively lower value in the BoR test. This lower strength value in the BoR test is attributed to the more pronounced local buckling effect than the PoEF test. Based on that, it can concluded that the PoEF test is better and more reliable than the conventional BoR as for testing the ultra-thin silicon dies, even though both tests are identical for the regularly thin dies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薄硅模具在BoR和PoEF试验中的双轴弯曲强度比较
本文采用经典的环上球(BoR)试验对薄硅模具进行了双轴弯曲强度试验,并与新提出的弹性基础点荷载(PoEF)试验结果进行了比较。回顾了BoR试验的几何线性解和非线性解,并分别给出了理论和数值公式。对尺寸为10 mm × 10 mm的薄硅模(t = 42 μm、57 μm和82 μm)进行了BoR试验,给出了3种不同厚度(t = 42 μm、57 μm和82 μm)的弯曲强度、载荷-位移曲线和破坏模式,并与已发表的PoEF试验数据进行了比较。结果表明,对于57 μm和82 μm厚的模具,BoR和PoEF测试的数据非常一致,但对于42 μm厚的模具,BoR测试的数据相对较低。与PoEF试验相比,BoR试验中较低的强度值归因于更明显的局部屈曲效应。基于此,可以得出结论,PoEF测试比常规的BoR测试在超薄硅模具测试中更好、更可靠,尽管这两种测试在常规薄模具测试中是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electronic Packaging
Journal of Electronic Packaging 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electronic Packaging publishes papers that use experimental and theoretical (analytical and computer-aided) methods, approaches, and techniques to address and solve various mechanical, materials, and reliability problems encountered in the analysis, design, manufacturing, testing, and operation of electronic and photonics components, devices, and systems. Scope: Microsystems packaging; Systems integration; Flexible electronics; Materials with nano structures and in general small scale systems.
期刊最新文献
Process Recipe and Functional Circuitry Performance On Aerosol Jet Printed Water-Based Silver Ink Incorporating Tensile Stress into Electromigration Life Prediction for Cu/SAC305/Cu Solder Joints Transient Liquid Phase Bond Acceleration Using Copper Nanowires Impact of Immersion Cooling On Thermomechanical Properties of Halogen-free Substrate Core Virtual Testbed for Economical and Reliability Analysis of Battery Thermal Management Control Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1