As manifestações de empatia entre humanos e n˜åo-humano em Androides sonham com ovelhas elétricas? (1968) de Philip K. Dick

Luana de Carvalho Krüger, Eduardo Marks de Marques
{"title":"As manifestações de empatia entre humanos e n˜åo-humano em Androides sonham com ovelhas elétricas? (1968) de Philip K. Dick","authors":"Luana de Carvalho Krüger, Eduardo Marks de Marques","doi":"10.5007/2176-8552.2019.E73327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transhumanist and post-humanist studies present the improvement of the human body as a way of guaranteeing more autonomy to individuals, however, the more involvement and improvement of the bodies, the more robotic the humans can become. Some dystopian works, which bring the discussion about human bodies and artificial bodies, point to a phenomenon of distance between humans and exclusion of the weakest and/or different from a physical appearance and standard behavior. In contrast, there are humanoid robots with artificial life enhancement that seeks to show human behavior in robotic bodies. In this work, it will be analyzed how empathy can be manifested in non-human bodies from the concept of artificial life in the work Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), by Philip K. Dick, trying to understand how the concept of empathy presented in the narrative is flawed and manifests itself as a way to restrict and eliminate the existence of non-human bodies. To this end, researchers such as Hayles (1999), Bedau (2007) and Brand (2013) will be used to discuss conceptual aspects of transhumanism, post-humanism and artificial life.","PeriodicalId":31415,"journal":{"name":"Outra Travessia","volume":"2 1","pages":"47-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outra Travessia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2176-8552.2019.E73327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transhumanist and post-humanist studies present the improvement of the human body as a way of guaranteeing more autonomy to individuals, however, the more involvement and improvement of the bodies, the more robotic the humans can become. Some dystopian works, which bring the discussion about human bodies and artificial bodies, point to a phenomenon of distance between humans and exclusion of the weakest and/or different from a physical appearance and standard behavior. In contrast, there are humanoid robots with artificial life enhancement that seeks to show human behavior in robotic bodies. In this work, it will be analyzed how empathy can be manifested in non-human bodies from the concept of artificial life in the work Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), by Philip K. Dick, trying to understand how the concept of empathy presented in the narrative is flawed and manifests itself as a way to restrict and eliminate the existence of non-human bodies. To this end, researchers such as Hayles (1999), Bedau (2007) and Brand (2013) will be used to discuss conceptual aspects of transhumanism, post-humanism and artificial life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类和非人类之间的同理心表现在机器人梦见电羊?(1968)菲利普·k·迪克
超人类主义和后人类主义的研究将人体的改善作为一种保证个人更多自主权的方式,然而,身体的参与和改善越多,人类就会变得越机器人。一些反乌托邦作品带来了关于人体和人造身体的讨论,指出了一种人与人之间的距离和排斥最弱和/或不同于物理外观和标准行为的现象。相比之下,有些人形机器人具有人工生命增强功能,试图在机器人身体中展示人类行为。在本作品中,将从作品《Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?》中的人工生命概念出发,分析共情如何在非人类的身体中表现出来。Philip K. Dick(1968),试图理解叙事中所呈现的共情概念是如何有缺陷的,并表现为限制和消除非人类身体存在的一种方式。为此,Hayles(1999)、Bedau(2007)和Brand(2013)等研究人员将被用来讨论超人类主义、后人文主义和人工生命的概念方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Esparsos: a obra inédita de Cecília Meireles O salto do touro: a mitopoesia de O risco do bordado, de Autran Dourado A expressividade na obra neorrealista de Júlio Pomar: uma apresentação deformadamente grotesca Marguerite Duras, a escrita e a experiência Ascensão e ruína na era do ímpeto modernizante: uma leitura comparativa de São Bernardo, de Graciliano Ramos, e Absalão, Absalão!, de William Faulkner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1