The Effect of Yeast Inoculation Methods on the Metabolite Composition of Sauvignon Blanc Wines

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Fermentation-Basel Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.3390/fermentation9080759
F. Pinu, Lily Stuart, Taylan Topal, Abby Albright, D. Martin, C. Grose
{"title":"The Effect of Yeast Inoculation Methods on the Metabolite Composition of Sauvignon Blanc Wines","authors":"F. Pinu, Lily Stuart, Taylan Topal, Abby Albright, D. Martin, C. Grose","doi":"10.3390/fermentation9080759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence from the literature suggests that different inoculation strategies using either active dry yeast (ADY) or freshly prepared yeast cultures affect wine yeast performance, thus altering biomass and many primary and secondary metabolites produced during fermentation. Here, we investigated how different inoculation methods changed the fermentation behaviour and metabolism of a commercial wine yeast. Using a commercial Sauvignon blanc (SB) grape juice, fermentation was carried out with two different inoculum preparation protocols using Saccharomyces cerevisiae X5: rehydration of commercial ADY and preparation of pre-inoculum in a rich laboratory medium. We also determined the effect of different numbers of yeast cells inoculation (varying from 1 × 106 to 1 × 1012) and successive inoculation on fermentation and end-product formation. The yeast inoculation method and number of cells significantly affected the fermentation time. Principal component analysis (PCA) using 60 wine metabolites showed a separation pattern between wines produced from the two inoculation methods. Inoculation methods influenced the production of amino acids and different aroma compounds, including ethyl and acetate esters. Varietal thiols, 3-mercaptohexanol (3MH), and 4-methyl-4-mercaptopentan-2-one (4MMP) in the wines were affected by the inoculation methods and numbers of inoculated cells, while little impact was observed on 3-mercaptohexyl acetate (3MHA) production. Pathway analysis using these quantified metabolites allowed us to identify the most significant pathways, most of which were related to central carbon metabolism, particularly metabolic pathways involving nitrogen and sulphur metabolism. Altogether, these results suggest that inoculation method and number of inoculated cells should be considered in the production of different wine styles.","PeriodicalId":48535,"journal":{"name":"Fermentation-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fermentation-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9080759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence from the literature suggests that different inoculation strategies using either active dry yeast (ADY) or freshly prepared yeast cultures affect wine yeast performance, thus altering biomass and many primary and secondary metabolites produced during fermentation. Here, we investigated how different inoculation methods changed the fermentation behaviour and metabolism of a commercial wine yeast. Using a commercial Sauvignon blanc (SB) grape juice, fermentation was carried out with two different inoculum preparation protocols using Saccharomyces cerevisiae X5: rehydration of commercial ADY and preparation of pre-inoculum in a rich laboratory medium. We also determined the effect of different numbers of yeast cells inoculation (varying from 1 × 106 to 1 × 1012) and successive inoculation on fermentation and end-product formation. The yeast inoculation method and number of cells significantly affected the fermentation time. Principal component analysis (PCA) using 60 wine metabolites showed a separation pattern between wines produced from the two inoculation methods. Inoculation methods influenced the production of amino acids and different aroma compounds, including ethyl and acetate esters. Varietal thiols, 3-mercaptohexanol (3MH), and 4-methyl-4-mercaptopentan-2-one (4MMP) in the wines were affected by the inoculation methods and numbers of inoculated cells, while little impact was observed on 3-mercaptohexyl acetate (3MHA) production. Pathway analysis using these quantified metabolites allowed us to identify the most significant pathways, most of which were related to central carbon metabolism, particularly metabolic pathways involving nitrogen and sulphur metabolism. Altogether, these results suggest that inoculation method and number of inoculated cells should be considered in the production of different wine styles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酵母接种方式对长相思葡萄酒代谢物组成的影响
来自文献的证据表明,使用活性干酵母(ADY)或新鲜制备的酵母培养物的不同接种策略会影响葡萄酒酵母的性能,从而改变生物质和发酵过程中产生的许多初级和次级代谢物。在这里,我们研究了不同的接种方法如何改变发酵行为和代谢的商品酒酵母。以商品长相思(SB)葡萄汁为原料,采用酿酒酵母X5两种不同的接种物制备方案进行发酵:商用ADY复水化和在丰富的实验室培养基中制备预接种物。我们还确定了不同数量的酵母细胞接种(从1 × 106到1 × 1012不等)和连续接种对发酵和最终产物形成的影响。酵母接种方式和细胞数对发酵时间有显著影响。主成分分析(PCA)显示了两种接种方法生产的葡萄酒之间的分离模式。接种方法影响了氨基酸和不同香气化合物(包括乙酯和乙酸酯)的产生。不同接种方式和接种细胞数量对葡萄酒中硫醇、3-巯基己醇(3MH)和4-甲基-4-巯基己醇-2-酮(4MMP)含量均有影响,而对3-巯基己醇乙酸(3MHA)的产量影响不大。利用这些量化的代谢物进行途径分析使我们能够确定最重要的途径,其中大多数与中心碳代谢有关,特别是涉及氮和硫代谢的代谢途径。综上所述,这些结果表明,在生产不同风格的葡萄酒时,应考虑接种方法和接种细胞的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fermentation-Basel
Fermentation-Basel BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.90%
发文量
594
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Application of Corynebacterium glutamicum in l-Threonine Biosynthesis Volatile Fatty Acid Recovery from Arrested Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuel: A Review Impact of Thermo-Mechanical Pretreatment of Sargassum muticum on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Wheat Straw Solid-State Fermentation as a Sustainable Tool for Extracting Phenolic Compounds from Cascalote Pods Temperature and pH Optimization for Protease Production Fermented by Yarrowia lipolytica from Agro-Industrial Waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1