Can God's work in history be discerned? The ambiguities of providence in the poetry of John Milton

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1017/S0036930623000017
Benjamin P. Myers
{"title":"Can God's work in history be discerned? The ambiguities of providence in the poetry of John Milton","authors":"Benjamin P. Myers","doi":"10.1017/S0036930623000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Is the doctrine of providence a guide to interpreting history? The early work of John Milton is optimistic about the possibility of such providential discernment. Milton lived during one of the most turbulent periods of English history and was actively involved in the cause of revolution and social reform. His poems typically centre on moments of historical change that seem to illuminate the ultimate meaning of history. After his revolutionary hopes had been shattered, Milton came to perceive a much more ambiguous relationship between history and providence. What history reveals, he now thought, is mostly a pattern of repetition and decline. Milton ends Paradise Lost with the reflection that belief in providence is not so much a species of knowledge as a practice of life. This article traces Milton's movement from providential optimism to providential pessimism and argues for a conception of history in which even acts of divine intervention do not unambiguously alter the course of history.","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"240 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930623000017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Is the doctrine of providence a guide to interpreting history? The early work of John Milton is optimistic about the possibility of such providential discernment. Milton lived during one of the most turbulent periods of English history and was actively involved in the cause of revolution and social reform. His poems typically centre on moments of historical change that seem to illuminate the ultimate meaning of history. After his revolutionary hopes had been shattered, Milton came to perceive a much more ambiguous relationship between history and providence. What history reveals, he now thought, is mostly a pattern of repetition and decline. Milton ends Paradise Lost with the reflection that belief in providence is not so much a species of knowledge as a practice of life. This article traces Milton's movement from providential optimism to providential pessimism and argues for a conception of history in which even acts of divine intervention do not unambiguously alter the course of history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神在历史上的作为能被看透吗?弥尔顿诗歌中天意的模糊性
天意学说是解释历史的指南吗?约翰·弥尔顿的早期作品,对这种天意辨别的可能性持乐观态度。弥尔顿生活在英国历史上最动荡的时期之一,他积极投身于革命和社会改革事业。他的诗歌通常集中在历史变化的时刻,似乎阐明了历史的最终意义。在他的革命希望破灭后,弥尔顿开始意识到历史和天意之间的关系更加模糊。他现在认为,历史揭示的主要是一种重复和衰落的模式。弥尔顿在《失乐园》的结尾反思道,对上帝的信仰与其说是一种知识,不如说是一种生活实践。这篇文章追溯了弥尔顿从天意乐观主义到天意悲观主义的转变,并论证了一种历史观,在这种历史观中,即使是神的干预行为,也不会明确地改变历史的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions Apocalyptic praxis in Evagrius of Pontus and Francis of Assisi Beyond text to God: Bonaventure's transformation of exegetical method from his Breviloquium to Itinerarium mentis in Deum (1257–1259) ‘The visible renewal of human life’: Barth's ethical assessment of the Reformed confessions The beauty of the body and the ascension: A reclamation and subversion of physical beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1