Review of Maia Kotrosits, Rethinking Early Christian Identity: Affect, Violence and Belonging, Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 2015

R. Seesengood
{"title":"Review of Maia Kotrosits, Rethinking Early Christian Identity: Affect, Violence and Belonging, Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 2015","authors":"R. Seesengood","doi":"10.2104/BCT.V13I1.676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christian self-identity vis-a-vis Judaism is a stone in the shoe of scholarship on ancient Christian literature as the twenty-first century begins. Significant work re-thinking traditional Jewish and Christian self-definition and separation (wistfully put: “the parting of the ways”) appeared at the dawn of the twenty-first century (Boyarin 1999; 2000; Jacobs 2004; Lieu 2005); it merged in part with scholarship on Pauline selfdesignation and identity in the 1970s (Stendhal 1976; Sanders 1977 and their “new perspective” descendants) as biblical scholarship's contribution to larger, post-ColdWar conversations pitting neoliberal capitalism against populist nationalism and foregrounding Subjectivity and ethnicity. At present, the discussion is clearly finding an audience: 2015 saw the release of several dense tomes on the question (Sanders 2015; Dunn 2015; Lieu 2015; Gager 2015; Keck 2015), each presenting itself as definitive, each bristling with page-tapping citation and edgy polemic. In a year of so many “seminal” analyses, the most significant was the utterly brilliant Maia Kotrosits's Rethinking Early Christian Identity. Kotrosits has written a historically informed, erudite, and literate book that offers new insight and original argument. If these other books have a use, it is survey; at best they are recommended skimming (an afternoon with one of them will equip you with the salient arguments of them all). Kotrosits, in contrast, is required close reading for anyone interested in where the conversation could go next.","PeriodicalId":53382,"journal":{"name":"The Bible and Critical Theory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bible and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2104/BCT.V13I1.676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Christian self-identity vis-a-vis Judaism is a stone in the shoe of scholarship on ancient Christian literature as the twenty-first century begins. Significant work re-thinking traditional Jewish and Christian self-definition and separation (wistfully put: “the parting of the ways”) appeared at the dawn of the twenty-first century (Boyarin 1999; 2000; Jacobs 2004; Lieu 2005); it merged in part with scholarship on Pauline selfdesignation and identity in the 1970s (Stendhal 1976; Sanders 1977 and their “new perspective” descendants) as biblical scholarship's contribution to larger, post-ColdWar conversations pitting neoliberal capitalism against populist nationalism and foregrounding Subjectivity and ethnicity. At present, the discussion is clearly finding an audience: 2015 saw the release of several dense tomes on the question (Sanders 2015; Dunn 2015; Lieu 2015; Gager 2015; Keck 2015), each presenting itself as definitive, each bristling with page-tapping citation and edgy polemic. In a year of so many “seminal” analyses, the most significant was the utterly brilliant Maia Kotrosits's Rethinking Early Christian Identity. Kotrosits has written a historically informed, erudite, and literate book that offers new insight and original argument. If these other books have a use, it is survey; at best they are recommended skimming (an afternoon with one of them will equip you with the salient arguments of them all). Kotrosits, in contrast, is required close reading for anyone interested in where the conversation could go next.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maia Kotrosits评论,《反思早期基督教身份:情感、暴力和归属》,明尼阿波利斯,堡垒出版社,2015年
在21世纪伊始,基督教与犹太教的自我认同是古代基督教文学学术研究中的一块石头。重新思考传统犹太教和基督教的自我定义和分离的重要作品出现在二十一世纪的黎明(Boyarin 1999;2000;雅各布斯2004;而2005);在20世纪70年代,它部分地与关于波林自我定位和身份的学术合并(Stendhal 1976;桑德斯(Sanders, 1977)和他们的“新视角”后代)作为圣经学术对冷战后更大范围的对话的贡献,这些对话将新自由主义资本主义与民粹主义民族主义对立起来,并将主体性和种族性放在突出位置。目前,这种讨论显然找到了受众:2015年,关于这个问题的几部密集的大部头出版(Sanders 2015;邓恩2015;而2015;计量者2015;凯克(Keck, 2015)),每一个都以权威性的形式呈现,每一个都充斥着翻页引用和尖锐的争论。在这一年中有如此多的“开创性”分析,其中最重要的是Maia kotrosit的《重新思考早期基督教身份》。kotrosit写了一本历史见多识广、博学多才、有文化的书,提供了新的见解和原创的论点。如果说这些书有什么用处,那就是概览;最好的建议是略读(阅读其中一本书一个下午,你就能掌握所有书的主要论点)。相比之下,任何想知道对话下一步走向的人都需要仔细阅读《kotrosit》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 farm outbreaks in Ontario, January-December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 both show similarly reduced disease severity of COVID-19 compared to Delta, Germany, 2021 to 2022. The Israelites Tell Their Story: PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION The Disputed Pauline Letters:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1