Disinformation and gendered boundarymaking: Nordic media audiences making sense of “Swedish decline”

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cooperation and Conflict Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1177/00108367211059445
Emil Edenborg
{"title":"Disinformation and gendered boundarymaking: Nordic media audiences making sense of “Swedish decline”","authors":"Emil Edenborg","doi":"10.1177/00108367211059445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how Russian geostrategic communication is entangled in global gender politics. The aim is to understand the resonance of disinformation in relation to culturalized, ethnicized and racialized narratives of gender, or “gendered boundarymaking.” The analysis is based on focus group discussions with Swedish, Danish, and Norwegian individuals, asked to share their impressions of news articles from the Russian media agency Sputnik, which all depicted Sweden as a warning example of multiculturalism and feminism gone “too far.” In the discussions, participants opposed a gender equal “self” to a patriarchal immigrant “other,” narrated Sweden as a country exceptionally concerned with gender, and tapped into competing temporalities of progress and decline. The article contributes to research on geostrategic communication by showing how disinformation efforts draw upon gendered national identities and debates about gender and immigration. More importantly, the article demonstrates that such gendered boundarymaking shapes audiences’ interpretations in crucial ways. Rather than viewing disinformation only from a state-centered lens of national security, in isolation from racism, Islamophobia, anti-feminism, and queerphobia within Western societies, research should acknowledge the interconnections between geostrategic communication and everyday boundarymaking. This will be pivotal to developing counterstrategies to disinformation, whether Russian or homegrown.","PeriodicalId":47286,"journal":{"name":"Cooperation and Conflict","volume":"57 1","pages":"496 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooperation and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211059445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article examines how Russian geostrategic communication is entangled in global gender politics. The aim is to understand the resonance of disinformation in relation to culturalized, ethnicized and racialized narratives of gender, or “gendered boundarymaking.” The analysis is based on focus group discussions with Swedish, Danish, and Norwegian individuals, asked to share their impressions of news articles from the Russian media agency Sputnik, which all depicted Sweden as a warning example of multiculturalism and feminism gone “too far.” In the discussions, participants opposed a gender equal “self” to a patriarchal immigrant “other,” narrated Sweden as a country exceptionally concerned with gender, and tapped into competing temporalities of progress and decline. The article contributes to research on geostrategic communication by showing how disinformation efforts draw upon gendered national identities and debates about gender and immigration. More importantly, the article demonstrates that such gendered boundarymaking shapes audiences’ interpretations in crucial ways. Rather than viewing disinformation only from a state-centered lens of national security, in isolation from racism, Islamophobia, anti-feminism, and queerphobia within Western societies, research should acknowledge the interconnections between geostrategic communication and everyday boundarymaking. This will be pivotal to developing counterstrategies to disinformation, whether Russian or homegrown.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚假信息与性别划分:北欧媒体受众对“瑞典衰落”的理解
本文探讨了俄罗斯地缘战略传播如何与全球性别政治纠缠在一起。目的是了解虚假信息与文化化、种族化和种族化的性别叙事或“性别边界制造”之间的共鸣。该分析基于与瑞典、丹麦和挪威个人的焦点小组讨论,被要求分享他们对俄罗斯媒体机构Sputnik的新闻文章的印象,所有这些都将瑞典描绘成多元文化主义和女权主义“走得太远”的警告性例子。在讨论中,参与者反对性别平等的“自我”和父权制移民的“他者”,将瑞典描述为一个特别关注性别的国家,并利用进步和衰落的竞争时间。这篇文章展示了虚假信息如何利用性别国家身份以及关于性别和移民的辩论,为地缘战略传播的研究做出了贡献。更重要的是,这篇文章表明,这种性别化的越界行为以至关重要的方式塑造了观众的解读。研究不应该仅仅从以国家为中心的国家安全视角来看待虚假信息,而应该孤立于西方社会中的种族主义、伊斯兰恐惧症、反女权主义和酷儿恐惧症,而应该承认地缘战略沟通与日常困境之间的相互联系。这对于制定应对虚假信息的战略至关重要,无论是俄罗斯的还是本土的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Published for over 40 years, the aim of Cooperation and Conflict is to promote research on and understanding of international relations. It believes in the deeds of academic pluralism and thus does not represent any specific methodology, approach, tradition or school. The mission of the journal is to meet the demands of the scholarly community having an interest in international studies (for details, see the statement "From the Editors" in Vol. 40, No. 3, September 2005). The editors especially encourage submissions contributing new knowledge of the field and welcome innovative, theory-aware and critical approaches. First preference will continue to be given to articles that have a Nordic and European focus. Cooperation and Conflict strictly adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy.
期刊最新文献
The rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire’s religiously inspired status symbols Is world politics class politics? States, social forces and voting in the United Nations General Assembly 1946–2020 ‘Recognising Merit’ in late British colonial Cyprus The importance of being civilized: Opera houses as status symbols in International Relations Forum on Heikki Patomäki’s World Statehood: The Future of World Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1