Metaphoric BotaniesConjectures on the Renaissance Fœtus

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 HISTORY Revue de Synthese Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1163/19552343-14234018
T. Kang
{"title":"Metaphoric BotaniesConjectures on the Renaissance Fœtus","authors":"T. Kang","doi":"10.1163/19552343-14234018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Renaissance witnessed a proliferation in medical discourse, pedagogical illustration, and popular rhetoric – what I refer to here as “metaphoric botanies” – comparing the human fœtus, or embryo, to a plant. Far from being a mere linguistic inheritance from ancient medicine, such “metaphoric botanies” not only allowed early moderns to conceive of the unobservable development of the human fœtus, but also emphasized the relation of the mother to the unborn child. Much of the “metaphoric botanies” surrounding the fœtus throughout the Renaissance analogize its development to that of a plant “rooting” itself in the mother’s uterus, through which it receives sustenance. Though feminist scholarship has made the important argument that such language has historically been utilized in debates surrounding abortion, these “botanies” might also be placed within a certain representational tradition, through which it might be understood as a meditation on species-being and -continuation in a period fraught with epistemological and metaphysical uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":41264,"journal":{"name":"Revue de Synthese","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de Synthese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19552343-14234018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Renaissance witnessed a proliferation in medical discourse, pedagogical illustration, and popular rhetoric – what I refer to here as “metaphoric botanies” – comparing the human fœtus, or embryo, to a plant. Far from being a mere linguistic inheritance from ancient medicine, such “metaphoric botanies” not only allowed early moderns to conceive of the unobservable development of the human fœtus, but also emphasized the relation of the mother to the unborn child. Much of the “metaphoric botanies” surrounding the fœtus throughout the Renaissance analogize its development to that of a plant “rooting” itself in the mother’s uterus, through which it receives sustenance. Though feminist scholarship has made the important argument that such language has historically been utilized in debates surrounding abortion, these “botanies” might also be placed within a certain representational tradition, through which it might be understood as a meditation on species-being and -continuation in a period fraught with epistemological and metaphysical uncertainty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于文艺复兴的猜想Fœtus
文艺复兴时期见证了医学论述、教学插图和流行修辞的激增——我在这里称之为“隐喻植物学”——将人类fœtus或胚胎比作植物。这种“隐喻植物学”不仅仅是古代医学的语言继承,它不仅使早期的现代人能够想象人类不可观察的发展fœtus,而且还强调了母亲与未出生的孩子的关系。在整个文艺复兴时期,围绕fœtus的许多“隐喻植物学”都将其发展类比为植物在母亲的子宫中“生根”,并通过子宫获得营养。尽管女权主义学者提出了一个重要的论点,即这种语言在历史上一直被用于围绕堕胎的辩论中,但这些“植物学”也可能被置于某种代表性传统中,通过这种传统,它可能被理解为在一个充满认识论和形而上学不确定性的时期对物种存在和延续的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Roe v Wade, Dobbs, and the Future of Graduate Medical Education.
IF 0 Journal of graduate medical educationPub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00279.1
Mary E Klingensmith, Gabriella G Gosman, Dineo Khabele, Beth S Brinkmann
The implications of overturning Roe v. Wade on medical education and future physicians
IF 7.4 Lancet Regional Health-AmericasPub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100334
Ariana M. Traub , Kellen Mermin-Bunnell , Priyasha Pareek , Sonya Williams , Natalie B. Connell , Jennifer F. Kawwass , Carrie Cwiak
来源期刊
Revue de Synthese
Revue de Synthese Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Créée par Henri Berr en 1900, La revue de synthèse, grâce au concours de nombreux universitaires français et étrangers, accueille des travaux d"histoire intellectuelle, d"épistémologie, de philosophie, de sociologie, d"histoire économique, sociale et culturelle. Elle a la vocation d"animer les réflexions situées au carrefour entre la philosophie, l"histoire des sciences et l"histoire générale en encourageant les recherches et les échanges sur les questions touchant aux fondements des sciences sociales, aux renouvellements de l"enquête sur les sciences, aux développements des voies nouvelles propres à l"histoire intellectuelle.
期刊最新文献
Histoire juive de la France, mode d’emploi au fil des pages (Tome 146, 7e Série, n°1-2, (2025)). Gestes et diagrammes: approches philosophiques, linguistiques et mathématiques. Le style, encore et toujours. La fabrique des êtres. Reproduction, par-delà la nature et l’artifice (XVIIIe-XXIe siècle). Qu’est-ce que les logoi philosophoi? (Tome 144, 7e Série, n°3-4, (2023))
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1