{"title":"Marijuana’s Changing Legal Landscape and Its Implications for Adolescent Psychiatrists: A Report from California","authors":"L. Ponton, Samuel Judice, T. Petti","doi":"10.2174/2210676611666211126155735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThirty-three states and the District of Columbia (DC) have enacted some form of legalized cannabis or cannabinoid for medical conditions (MMJ), 11 of them and DC for recreational use. It has become critical for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals working with adolescents to be aware of diversion of marijuana (MJ) to youth and subsequent potential adverse effects in environments with widely different regulations. The experience of two office-based psychiatrists in California (the first state to legalize MMJ) through case presentations and an informal practice review illustrate the role that diverted MMJ plays in the clinical presentation of youth for psychiatric care, highlighting clinical implications and guidelines for treators as states legalize MJ for adult recreational use. \n\n\n\n\n\nTwo child and adolescent psychiatrists practicing in California over the last twenty years report on their experiences working with adolescent patients and their families during the period of legalized MMJ. After a comprehensive literature review, they report their clinical observations and make recommendations for treators of adolescents.\n\n\n\n\nThere is general confusion among adolescents and their parents about MJ and MMJ. There is a lack of clear regulatory guidelines and a need for better clinical training for prescribing physicians. Diversion of MMJ to teens during periods of legalization of medical marijuana is common in states where it has been not legislated or regulated sufficiently to provide effective safeguards. This lax approach is demonstrated by our case reports and clinical review. Similar experiences have been reported elsewhere. Increased problems with diversion are expected as legalization efforts continue. Professionals and their organizations need to become more active in advocating policies to protect youth from potential harm related to cannabis use and abuse and carefully evaluate its use among their teen patients. \n\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676611666211126155735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia (DC) have enacted some form of legalized cannabis or cannabinoid for medical conditions (MMJ), 11 of them and DC for recreational use. It has become critical for psychiatrists and other mental health professionals working with adolescents to be aware of diversion of marijuana (MJ) to youth and subsequent potential adverse effects in environments with widely different regulations. The experience of two office-based psychiatrists in California (the first state to legalize MMJ) through case presentations and an informal practice review illustrate the role that diverted MMJ plays in the clinical presentation of youth for psychiatric care, highlighting clinical implications and guidelines for treators as states legalize MJ for adult recreational use.
Two child and adolescent psychiatrists practicing in California over the last twenty years report on their experiences working with adolescent patients and their families during the period of legalized MMJ. After a comprehensive literature review, they report their clinical observations and make recommendations for treators of adolescents.
There is general confusion among adolescents and their parents about MJ and MMJ. There is a lack of clear regulatory guidelines and a need for better clinical training for prescribing physicians. Diversion of MMJ to teens during periods of legalization of medical marijuana is common in states where it has been not legislated or regulated sufficiently to provide effective safeguards. This lax approach is demonstrated by our case reports and clinical review. Similar experiences have been reported elsewhere. Increased problems with diversion are expected as legalization efforts continue. Professionals and their organizations need to become more active in advocating policies to protect youth from potential harm related to cannabis use and abuse and carefully evaluate its use among their teen patients.
期刊介绍:
Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.