Quality education through writing: aligning learning objectives in learning materials and question papers using Bloom’s taxonomy

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1108/qae-03-2023-0045
Mrunal Chavda, Harsh Patel, Hetav Bhatt
{"title":"Quality education through writing: aligning learning objectives in learning materials and question papers using Bloom’s taxonomy","authors":"Mrunal Chavda, Harsh Patel, Hetav Bhatt","doi":"10.1108/qae-03-2023-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)-based English textbooks and question papers in developing second-language higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDescriptive analysis establishes a causal relationship between learning objectives and second language (L2) writing proficiency. Content analysis is used to compare and analyze tabulated data for textbooks and question papers for the English language by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and CBSE. This method categorizes the materials and their assessments under HOTS and lower-order thinking skills to ascertain the relationship between learning objectives and L2 writing proficiency.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study highlights teaching material and assessment shortcomings and their alignment with learning outcomes to enhance students' writing skills. It underscores the need for HOTS-focused materials, discussing their impact on writing skills. The study also explores how textbook–question paper mismatch hampers Bloom's taxonomy-based cognitive skills.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research illuminates the efficacy of teaching and learning English as a second language (ESL) writing skills to improve the quality of education, which has real-world implications. The study highlights flaws in the educational system in India and suggests curricular and pedagogical changes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe research examines NCERT and CBSE ESL textbooks and question papers to align teaching and assessment methods. The results aim to improve education through ESL writers' HOTS.\n","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2023-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)-based English textbooks and question papers in developing second-language higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Design/methodology/approach Descriptive analysis establishes a causal relationship between learning objectives and second language (L2) writing proficiency. Content analysis is used to compare and analyze tabulated data for textbooks and question papers for the English language by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and CBSE. This method categorizes the materials and their assessments under HOTS and lower-order thinking skills to ascertain the relationship between learning objectives and L2 writing proficiency. Findings The study highlights teaching material and assessment shortcomings and their alignment with learning outcomes to enhance students' writing skills. It underscores the need for HOTS-focused materials, discussing their impact on writing skills. The study also explores how textbook–question paper mismatch hampers Bloom's taxonomy-based cognitive skills. Practical implications This research illuminates the efficacy of teaching and learning English as a second language (ESL) writing skills to improve the quality of education, which has real-world implications. The study highlights flaws in the educational system in India and suggests curricular and pedagogical changes. Originality/value The research examines NCERT and CBSE ESL textbooks and question papers to align teaching and assessment methods. The results aim to improve education through ESL writers' HOTS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过写作进行素质教育:使用布鲁姆分类法在学习材料和试卷中调整学习目标
目的本研究旨在检验以中央中等教育委员会(CBSE)为基础的英语教材和试卷在培养第二语言高阶思维技能(HOTS)方面的有效性。设计/方法论/方法描述性分析建立了学习目标与第二语言(L2)写作能力之间的因果关系。国家教育研究与培训委员会(NCERT)和CBSE使用内容分析来比较和分析英语教科书和试卷的表格数据。该方法将材料及其评估分为HOTS和低阶思维技能,以确定学习目标与二语写作水平之间的关系。发现这项研究强调了教材和评估的不足之处,以及它们与学习结果的一致性,以提高学生的写作技能。它强调了以HOTS为重点的材料的必要性,讨论了它们对写作技能的影响。这项研究还探讨了教科书和试卷的不匹配如何阻碍布鲁姆基于分类法的认知技能。实践意义本研究阐明了英语作为第二语言(ESL)写作技能的教学效果,以提高教育质量,这具有现实意义。该研究强调了印度教育体系的缺陷,并提出了课程和教学改革的建议。原创性/价值该研究考察了NCERT和CBSE ESL教科书和试卷,以调整教学和评估方法。研究结果旨在通过ESL作家的HOTS来改善教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
期刊最新文献
The impact of gamification on meaningful learning and student performance in an undergraduate online engineering course Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education AI-enhanced education: exploring the impact of AI literacy on generation Z’s academic performance in Northern India Stakeholders’ involvement in economics and management programs quality assurance Experimental evidence for the efficacy of generative AI in improving students’ writing skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1