A Critical Study On Ghaybah Of Imam Mahdi Concept In Shi’ah Imamiyah Ithna ‘Ashariyyah

M. Muslih, Ahmad Tauhid Mafaza, Amir Sahidin
{"title":"A Critical Study On Ghaybah Of Imam Mahdi Concept In Shi’ah Imamiyah Ithna ‘Ashariyyah","authors":"M. Muslih, Ahmad Tauhid Mafaza, Amir Sahidin","doi":"10.24014/jush.v29i2.13981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate over whether the teachings of the Imāmah Shī'ah Imāmiyah Ithnā 'Ashariyah, including the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, cannot be avoided. Both SAW the need for Imamat as a substitute for the position of the prophet in managing religion and the world. However, there are fundamental differences that cannot be tolerated, according to ahl sunnah (Sunni), Imāmah is fardhu kifayah, while according to Shī'ah Imāmiyah, it is one of the principles of faith that must be believed. This Shī'ah belief also experienced a deadlock due to the polemic whether Imam al-Ḥasan al-'Ashkari had descendants or not. This deadlock was answered by them by bringing up a new concept in aqidah, called Ghaybah. Therefore, the author sees the need to critically examine this concept of ghaybah, because it is the foundation of the building of the Imamate that is believed to be. In addition to strengthening the faith of Muslims (Sunni), this study will also examine how strong the argument for the concept of ghaybah is. Through a study of the type of library research with a descriptive-critical analysis approach, it can be concluded, first, that the concept of ghaybah does not have a strong argumentative basis. Second, the figure of Imam Mahdi who they believed was only a fictitious figure. Third, the essence of Imam Mahdi's ghaybah contradicts the hadiths of the Prophet SAW and statements of the Shi'ah scholars themselves","PeriodicalId":17770,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v29i2.13981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate over whether the teachings of the Imāmah Shī'ah Imāmiyah Ithnā 'Ashariyah, including the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, cannot be avoided. Both SAW the need for Imamat as a substitute for the position of the prophet in managing religion and the world. However, there are fundamental differences that cannot be tolerated, according to ahl sunnah (Sunni), Imāmah is fardhu kifayah, while according to Shī'ah Imāmiyah, it is one of the principles of faith that must be believed. This Shī'ah belief also experienced a deadlock due to the polemic whether Imam al-Ḥasan al-'Ashkari had descendants or not. This deadlock was answered by them by bringing up a new concept in aqidah, called Ghaybah. Therefore, the author sees the need to critically examine this concept of ghaybah, because it is the foundation of the building of the Imamate that is believed to be. In addition to strengthening the faith of Muslims (Sunni), this study will also examine how strong the argument for the concept of ghaybah is. Through a study of the type of library research with a descriptive-critical analysis approach, it can be concluded, first, that the concept of ghaybah does not have a strong argumentative basis. Second, the figure of Imam Mahdi who they believed was only a fictitious figure. Third, the essence of Imam Mahdi's ghaybah contradicts the hadiths of the Prophet SAW and statements of the Shi'ah scholars themselves
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《什叶派》中玛赫迪观念的盖巴批判研究
关于Imāmah shir 'ah Imāmiyah ithnir 'Ashariyah的教义,包括先知穆罕默德的教义,是否不可避免的争论。他们都看到,在管理宗教和世界方面,伊玛目需要取代先知的地位。然而,根据ahl sunnah(逊尼派),Imāmah is fardhu kifayah是不能容忍的根本差异,而根据shi 'ah Imāmiyah,这是必须相信的信仰原则之一。由于伊玛目al-Ḥasan al-'Ashkari是否有后代的争论,这种shi 'ah信仰也经历了僵局。他们通过在aqidah中提出一个新的概念来解决这个僵局,叫做Ghaybah。因此,作者认为有必要对ghaybah这个概念进行批判性的研究,因为它被认为是伊玛目建筑的基础。除了加强穆斯林(逊尼派)的信仰外,本研究还将考察ghaybah概念的论据有多强。通过对图书馆研究类型的描述-批判分析方法的研究,可以得出结论,首先,ghaybah的概念没有强有力的论证基础。第二,他们认为伊玛目马赫迪只是一个虚构的人物。第三,伊玛目马赫迪的ghaybah的本质与先知穆罕默德的圣训和什叶派学者自己的陈述相矛盾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE SPIRAL ANDROMEDA PARADIGM; An Interpretation on Science Integration of UIN Suska Riau Criticism of the Pro-LGBT’s Misinterpretation of the Quranic Verses on the Illegality of LGBT Application of Ijmālī Method In Exegesis (Sharḥ) The Hadith of The Prophet: Analysis of the Book of Hadith using the Ijmālī Method Sufis and Women: The Study of Women's Sufis in The Western World On Imam Ghazālī's Farḍ ‘Ain and Farḍ Kifāyah: An Epistemological Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1