Apresentação: Pesquisar é estranhar a realidade

Eduardo Simonini, Roberta Carvalho Romagnoli
{"title":"Apresentação: Pesquisar é estranhar a realidade","authors":"Eduardo Simonini, Roberta Carvalho Romagnoli","doi":"10.22294/eduper/ppge/ufv.v10i.9660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge production is not a straight line that heads towards an undoubted progress. Rather, such production suffers continuous interferences from the interlacing of knowledge, practices, ways of thinking. In fact those questions caused interferences to the very notion of scientific research, since reality, seen as a puzzle to be solved – a code to be unveiled by means of theoretical-methodological tool increasingly precise – was considered to possess an immutable essence that served as a model from which to organize all the possible variations. Understanding that founding nucleus, that truth, point of genesis of the cosmos, of the great narratives of everything that is different from them, has become a project, surely ambitious, of modern science in its deployments in different knowledge areas. However, would it be possible to turn the methodical Cartesian doubt a tool for questioning the truths that modernity chose for itself: truths installed into great narratives to define positions of gender, of universe, education, behavior, future, order, happiness, of humanity? Would it be possible to estrange inclusively the very notion of “essence”, “truth” and “reality”? Would it be possible to use again the tool of doubt to produce estranging on what is already given as undoubted and put into a problematizer movement that which already assumed as unquestionable? From those restlessness, the papers gathered into that dossier have as goal – each one in its field of problematization – to bring a thought that estranges, putting movement into perspectives considered stable in their naturalization, dribbling the “truth” and welcoming the interferences produced (both in the reality, and in the researcher himself) by the process of knowing.","PeriodicalId":31461,"journal":{"name":"Educacao em Perspectiva","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao em Perspectiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22294/eduper/ppge/ufv.v10i.9660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge production is not a straight line that heads towards an undoubted progress. Rather, such production suffers continuous interferences from the interlacing of knowledge, practices, ways of thinking. In fact those questions caused interferences to the very notion of scientific research, since reality, seen as a puzzle to be solved – a code to be unveiled by means of theoretical-methodological tool increasingly precise – was considered to possess an immutable essence that served as a model from which to organize all the possible variations. Understanding that founding nucleus, that truth, point of genesis of the cosmos, of the great narratives of everything that is different from them, has become a project, surely ambitious, of modern science in its deployments in different knowledge areas. However, would it be possible to turn the methodical Cartesian doubt a tool for questioning the truths that modernity chose for itself: truths installed into great narratives to define positions of gender, of universe, education, behavior, future, order, happiness, of humanity? Would it be possible to estrange inclusively the very notion of “essence”, “truth” and “reality”? Would it be possible to use again the tool of doubt to produce estranging on what is already given as undoubted and put into a problematizer movement that which already assumed as unquestionable? From those restlessness, the papers gathered into that dossier have as goal – each one in its field of problematization – to bring a thought that estranges, putting movement into perspectives considered stable in their naturalization, dribbling the “truth” and welcoming the interferences produced (both in the reality, and in the researcher himself) by the process of knowing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
演讲:研究对现实很陌生
知识生产并不是一条通往毋庸置疑的进步的直线。相反,这种生产受到知识、实践和思维方式交织的持续干扰。事实上,这些问题对科学研究的概念本身造成了干扰,因为现实被视为一个有待解决的难题——一个将通过越来越精确的理论方法论工具揭示的代码——被认为具有一种不可变的本质,是一种组织所有可能变化的模型。理解宇宙的创始核心、真理、起源点,以及与之不同的一切的伟大叙事,已经成为现代科学在不同知识领域部署的一个项目,当然是雄心勃勃的。然而,有没有可能把有条不紊的笛卡尔怀疑变成一种工具,用来质疑现代性为自己选择的真理:真理被植入伟大的叙事中,以定义性别、宇宙、教育、行为、未来、秩序、幸福和人类的位置?有可能将“本质”、“真理”和“现实”这三个概念完全割裂开来吗?是否有可能再次使用怀疑的工具,对已经被赋予的毫无疑问的东西进行反思,并将其投入到已经被假定为毫无疑问的问题解决者运动中?从这些不安中,收集到该档案中的论文的目标是——每一篇都在其问题化领域——引入一种疏远的思想,将运动带入在其自然化过程中被认为稳定的视角,灌输“真相”,并欢迎(在现实中和研究者本人中)认识过程中产生的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Raça, classe e gênero ordem dos fatores não altera o resultado? pedagogia universitária e a formação de professores para a educação básica atuação do gestor escolar no enfrentamento da evasão no ensino médio da rede estadual paulista A formação e o desenvolvimento profissional docente: controvérsias, desafios e perspectivas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1