Paradox in the making: toward a theory of utility maximization in human-commercial robot interactions

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Change Management Pub Date : 2023-08-04 DOI:10.1108/jocm-08-2022-0243
S. Chou, Kate Barron, C. Ramser
{"title":"Paradox in the making: toward a theory of utility maximization in human-commercial robot interactions","authors":"S. Chou, Kate Barron, C. Ramser","doi":"10.1108/jocm-08-2022-0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article aims to develop a new theory that can better explain and predict how and when humans interact with commercial robots. To this end, utility maximization theory (UMT) along with four principles and propositions that may guide how human-to-commercial robot interactions are developed.Design/methodology/approachThis article conceptualizes UMT by drawing from social exchange, conservation of resources, and technology-driven theories.FindingsThis article proposes UMT, which consists of four guiding principles and propositions. First, it is proposed that the human must invest sufficient resources to initiate a human-to-commercial robot interaction. Second, the human forms an expectation of utility gain maximization once a human-to-commercial robot interaction is initiated. Third, the human severs a human-to-commercial robot interaction if the human is unable to witness maximum utility gain upon the interaction. Finally, once the human severs a human-to-commercial robot interaction, the human seeks to reinvest sufficient resources in another human-to-commercial robot interaction with the same expectation of utility maximization.Originality/valueThis article is one of the few studies that offers a theoretical foundation for understanding the interactions between humans and commercial robots. Additionally, this article provides several managerial implications for managing effective human-to-commercial robot interactions.","PeriodicalId":47958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-08-2022-0243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to develop a new theory that can better explain and predict how and when humans interact with commercial robots. To this end, utility maximization theory (UMT) along with four principles and propositions that may guide how human-to-commercial robot interactions are developed.Design/methodology/approachThis article conceptualizes UMT by drawing from social exchange, conservation of resources, and technology-driven theories.FindingsThis article proposes UMT, which consists of four guiding principles and propositions. First, it is proposed that the human must invest sufficient resources to initiate a human-to-commercial robot interaction. Second, the human forms an expectation of utility gain maximization once a human-to-commercial robot interaction is initiated. Third, the human severs a human-to-commercial robot interaction if the human is unable to witness maximum utility gain upon the interaction. Finally, once the human severs a human-to-commercial robot interaction, the human seeks to reinvest sufficient resources in another human-to-commercial robot interaction with the same expectation of utility maximization.Originality/valueThis article is one of the few studies that offers a theoretical foundation for understanding the interactions between humans and commercial robots. Additionally, this article provides several managerial implications for managing effective human-to-commercial robot interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制造中的悖论:走向人类与商业机器人互动中的效用最大化理论
目的本文旨在开发一种新的理论,更好地解释和预测人类如何以及何时与商业机器人互动。为此,开发了效用最大化理论(UMT)以及四个原则和命题,这些原则和命题可能会指导如何进行人与商业机器人的交互。设计/方法论/方法本文通过借鉴社会交换、资源保护和技术驱动的理论,将UMT概念化。发现本文提出了UMT,它由四个指导原则和主张组成。首先,提出了人类必须投入足够的资源来启动人与商业机器人的交互。其次,一旦人与商业机器人的互动开始,人类就形成了效用收益最大化的期望。第三,如果人类无法在交互中看到最大效用收益,则人类将切断人类与商业机器人的交互。最后,一旦人类切断了人与商业机器人的互动,人类就会寻求将足够的资源再投资于另一个人与商业机器人之间的互动,并抱有同样的效用最大化期望。原创性/价值本文是为数不多的为理解人类与商业机器人之间的互动提供理论基础的研究之一。此外,本文还为管理有效的人机交互提供了一些管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: ■Adapting strategic planning to the need for change ■Leadership research ■Responsibility for change implementation and follow-through ■The psychology of change and its effect on the workforce ■TQM - will it work in your organization? Successful organizations respond intelligently to factors which precipitate change. Economic climates, political trends, changes in consumer demands, management policy or structure, employment levels and financial resources - all these elements are constantly at play to ensure that organizations clinging on to static structures will ultimately lose out. But change is a dynamic and alarming thing - this journal addresses how to manage it positively.
期刊最新文献
Developing and validating a scale for entrepreneurial marketing orientations: EMICO framework and its impact on business performance in startups School principals’ resistance to change: a multilevel analysis of individual factors and contextual conditions A systematic literature review on the network perspective and resource interaction: where are we now and where should we go? “I am served by a Robot!”: internal antecedents of customer acceptance of robotic hotel-service agents Unveiling organizational consciousness: a conceptual framework for nurturing thriving organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1