Assessing and detecting response bias in self and referenced attitude towards conflict in family cases

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL European Journal of Education and Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.32457/ejep.v15i3.2015
R. Arce, Verónica Marcos, Jéssica Sanmarco, Bárbara Castro
{"title":"Assessing and detecting response bias in self and referenced attitude towards conflict in family cases","authors":"R. Arce, Verónica Marcos, Jéssica Sanmarco, Bárbara Castro","doi":"10.32457/ejep.v15i3.2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: Contentious couple breakup is associated to adverse outcomes for couple members and offspring. Parental attitudes towards conflict resolution are a robust predictor of the litigiousness of the breakup. Nonetheless, response bias should be strongly suspected in parental attitude reported in this setting. Thus, a field study with the aim of knowing the prevalence and magnitude of the response bias and of ascertaining empirically valid criteria to classify the suspect of response bias was designed. Method: A total of 2,797 adults, 50.9 % men, with underage children aged from 21 to 68 years (M = 40.41), 2,488 married (without previous breakups), 204 involved in a mutual agreement separation and 105 in a contentious separation, answered to a measure of self-reported and referenced attitude towards conflict resolution. Results: The results exhibited that parents of the contentious and mutual agreement separation groups biased their answers. Likewise, the results provided empirical criteria for response bias classification. Epidemiologically, the observed probability of response bias was of .629[.537, .721] in the group of parents of contentious separation and of .377[.310, .444] in the group of parents of mutual agreement separation. Conclusions: The implications of the results for the design and implementation of mediation and intervention programs are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44987,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v15i3.2015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Contentious couple breakup is associated to adverse outcomes for couple members and offspring. Parental attitudes towards conflict resolution are a robust predictor of the litigiousness of the breakup. Nonetheless, response bias should be strongly suspected in parental attitude reported in this setting. Thus, a field study with the aim of knowing the prevalence and magnitude of the response bias and of ascertaining empirically valid criteria to classify the suspect of response bias was designed. Method: A total of 2,797 adults, 50.9 % men, with underage children aged from 21 to 68 years (M = 40.41), 2,488 married (without previous breakups), 204 involved in a mutual agreement separation and 105 in a contentious separation, answered to a measure of self-reported and referenced attitude towards conflict resolution. Results: The results exhibited that parents of the contentious and mutual agreement separation groups biased their answers. Likewise, the results provided empirical criteria for response bias classification. Epidemiologically, the observed probability of response bias was of .629[.537, .721] in the group of parents of contentious separation and of .377[.310, .444] in the group of parents of mutual agreement separation. Conclusions: The implications of the results for the design and implementation of mediation and intervention programs are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和检测家庭案例中对冲突的自我和参考态度的反应偏差
背景/目的:有争议的夫妻分手会给夫妻成员和后代带来不利后果。父母对解决冲突的态度是分手诉讼性的有力预测因素。尽管如此,在这种情况下报告的父母态度应该强烈怀疑反应偏差。因此,设计了一项实地研究,目的是了解反应偏倚的普遍性和程度,并确定根据经验对反应偏倚嫌疑人进行分类的有效标准。方法:共有2797名成年人,50.9%为男性,有21至68岁的未成年子女(男性=40.41),2488名已婚(之前没有分手),204名参与了双方协议分居,105名参与了有争议的分居,他们对解决冲突的自报和参考态度进行了回答。结果:研究结果表明,有争议的和相互同意的分离群体的父母对他们的答案有偏见。同样,研究结果为反应偏差分类提供了经验标准。从流行病学角度来看,在有争议分居的父母组中,观察到的反应偏倚概率为.629[.537,.721],在相互同意分居的父母中为.377[.310,.444]。结论:讨论了结果对调解和干预计划的设计和实施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10): un meta-análisis de generalización de la fiabilidad Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2023) Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica para Situaciones Académicas (EAPESA) en Universitarios del Ecuador Cribado Universal en Población Escolar Panameña: Lectura, Escritura y Matemáticas Regulación emocional y cultura en contextos escolares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1