Italian Version of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool: Properties and Usefulness of a Decision-Making Tool for Subjects’ Discharge after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

M. Monticone, L. Frigau, C. Sconza, C. Foti, F. Mola, S. Respizzi
{"title":"Italian Version of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool: Properties and Usefulness of a Decision-Making Tool for Subjects’ Discharge after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"M. Monticone, L. Frigau, C. Sconza, C. Foti, F. Mola, S. Respizzi","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Growing attention is being given to standardized outcome measures to improve interventions for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT-I) to allow its predictive use after THA and TKA. Methods : The RAPT-I was adapted by forward–backward translation, a final review by an expert committee and a test of the pre-final version to establish its correspondence with the original version. The psychometric testing included test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC). The RAPT score was used to predict the subjects’ destination ( 9: discharge directly at home) by comparing the actual discharge destination with the predicted destination. The predictive effects of RAPT items on the discharge destination were further described by a logistic regression model (repeated leave-one-out bootstrap procedure). Results : The questionnaire was administered to 78 subjects with THA and 70 subjects with TKA and proven to be acceptable. The questionnaire showed excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.839; with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.725–0.934 for THA; ICC = 0.973, with 95% CI of 0.930–0.997 for TKA). The RAPT-I overall predictive validity was 87.2%, and the discharge destination was directly related to living condition (odds ratio (OR) = 2.530), mobility (OR = 2.626) and age (OR = 1.332) and inversely related to gait aids (OR = 0.623) and gender (OR = 0.474). Conclusions : The RAPT-I was successfully adapted into Italian and proven to exhibit satisfactory properties, including predictive validity in determining discharge destination.","PeriodicalId":73480,"journal":{"name":"International journal of statistics in medical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of statistics in medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background : Growing attention is being given to standardized outcome measures to improve interventions for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT-I) to allow its predictive use after THA and TKA. Methods : The RAPT-I was adapted by forward–backward translation, a final review by an expert committee and a test of the pre-final version to establish its correspondence with the original version. The psychometric testing included test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC). The RAPT score was used to predict the subjects’ destination ( 9: discharge directly at home) by comparing the actual discharge destination with the predicted destination. The predictive effects of RAPT items on the discharge destination were further described by a logistic regression model (repeated leave-one-out bootstrap procedure). Results : The questionnaire was administered to 78 subjects with THA and 70 subjects with TKA and proven to be acceptable. The questionnaire showed excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.839; with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.725–0.934 for THA; ICC = 0.973, with 95% CI of 0.930–0.997 for TKA). The RAPT-I overall predictive validity was 87.2%, and the discharge destination was directly related to living condition (odds ratio (OR) = 2.530), mobility (OR = 2.626) and age (OR = 1.332) and inversely related to gait aids (OR = 0.623) and gender (OR = 0.474). Conclusions : The RAPT-I was successfully adapted into Italian and proven to exhibit satisfactory properties, including predictive validity in determining discharge destination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利版风险评估和预测工具:全髋关节和膝关节置换术后受试者出院决策工具的特性和有用性
背景:人们越来越重视标准化的结果测量,以改善全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术的干预措施。我们对意大利版的风险评估和预测工具(RAPT-I)进行了文化调整和验证,以允许其在THA和TKA后进行预测性使用。方法:通过前向-后向翻译、专家委员会的最终审查和对最终版本的测试来调整RAPT-I,以确定其与原始版本的一致性。心理测量测试包括测试-再测试信度(组内相关系数,ICC)。RAPT评分用于通过比较实际出院目的地和预测目的地来预测受试者的目的地(9:直接在家出院)。RAPT项目对出院目的地的预测效果通过逻辑回归模型(重复留一自举程序)进一步描述。结果:对78名THA患者和70名TKA患者进行了问卷调查,并证明其可接受。该问卷显示出良好的测试-再测试可靠性(ICC=0.839;THA的95%置信区间(CI)为0.725–0.934;ICC=0.973,TKA的95%CI为0.930–0.997)。RAPT-I的总体预测有效性为87.2%,出院目的地与生活条件(比值比(OR)=2.530)、行动能力(OR=2.626)和年龄(OR=1.332)直接相关,与步态辅助(OR=0.623)和性别(OR=0.474)呈负相关,包括确定出院目的地的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Characteristics, Physical Environmental and Psychological On Quality Of Life Of Patients With DM Type II Competing Risks Model to Evaluate Dropout Dynamics Among the Type 1 Diabetes Patients Registered with the Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) Program The Impact of the Risk Perception of COVID-19 PANDEMIC on College Students' Occupational Anxiety: The Moderating Effect of Career Adaptability Adaptive Elastic Net on High-Dimensional Sparse Data with Multicollinearity: Application to Lipomatous Tumor Classification Triglyceridemic Waist Phenotypes as Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1