Heart Disease Knowledge Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties in Brazilian Adults

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Education Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1080/19325037.2022.2120121
Fernanda Maria Alves Lima, M. Jamas, H. Miot, M. A. Garcia de Avila
{"title":"Heart Disease Knowledge Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties in Brazilian Adults","authors":"Fernanda Maria Alves Lima, M. Jamas, H. Miot, M. A. Garcia de Avila","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2022.2120121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The assessment of knowledge about cardiovascular diseases through instruments helps to identify gaps and educational needs of the target audience. Purpose To validate and verify the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Heart Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (HDKQ-BR) for adults in Brazil. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study carried out in a Brazilian city with 300 participants. Internal consistency, temporal stability (test-retest) and convergent structural validity were verified. Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to determine parameters a (discrimination) and b (difficulty) of each item and the unidimensionality of the instrument and the differential item functioning (DIF) for sex, education and age. Results The internal consistency of the HDKQ-BR was 0.694. The test-retest reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.779). According to the IRT, parameter a was between 0.176 and 1.175 and parameter b between −10.834 and 4.969. Discussion The HDKQ-BR showed unidimensional structure and adequate psychometric performance for its application in populations with the same profile in Brazil. Translation to Health Education Practice To assess the knowledge of an adult population about CVDs is important for improving the health literacy. The study focused on Area I of Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists (Assessment of Needs and Capacity).","PeriodicalId":46846,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"394 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2120121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The assessment of knowledge about cardiovascular diseases through instruments helps to identify gaps and educational needs of the target audience. Purpose To validate and verify the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Heart Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (HDKQ-BR) for adults in Brazil. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study carried out in a Brazilian city with 300 participants. Internal consistency, temporal stability (test-retest) and convergent structural validity were verified. Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to determine parameters a (discrimination) and b (difficulty) of each item and the unidimensionality of the instrument and the differential item functioning (DIF) for sex, education and age. Results The internal consistency of the HDKQ-BR was 0.694. The test-retest reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.779). According to the IRT, parameter a was between 0.176 and 1.175 and parameter b between −10.834 and 4.969. Discussion The HDKQ-BR showed unidimensional structure and adequate psychometric performance for its application in populations with the same profile in Brazil. Translation to Health Education Practice To assess the knowledge of an adult population about CVDs is important for improving the health literacy. The study focused on Area I of Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists (Assessment of Needs and Capacity).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏病知识问卷:巴西成年人的心理测量特性
背景:通过仪器对心血管疾病知识的评估有助于确定目标受众的差距和教育需求。目的验证巴西版成人心脏病知识问卷(HDKQ-BR)的心理测量特性。方法采用横断面方法对巴西某城市300名参与者进行研究。内部一致性、时间稳定性(test-retest)和收敛结构效度验证。采用项目反应理论(IRT)确定每个项目的参数a(歧视)和b(困难),以及工具的单维性和性别、教育和年龄的差异项目功能(DIF)。结果HDKQ-BR的内部一致性为0.694。通过类内相关系数(ICC = 0.779)验证重测信度。根据IRT,参数a在0.176 ~ 1.175之间,参数b在- 10.834 ~ 4.969之间。HDKQ-BR具有单维结构,在巴西具有相同特征的人群中具有足够的心理测量性能。评估成人心血管疾病知识对提高健康素养具有重要意义。这项研究的重点是保健教育专家责任领域一(需求和能力评估)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Education
American Journal of Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: AJHE is sponsored by the American Association for Health Education of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The mission of the American Association for Health Education(AAHE) is to advance the profession by serving health educators and others who strive to promote the health of all people through education and other systematic strategies.AAHE addresses the following priorities •Develop and promulgate standards, resources and services regarding health education to professionals and non-professionals •Foster the development of national research priorities in health education and promotion. Provide mechanisms for the translation and interaction between theory, research and practice.
期刊最新文献
College Students’ Preference and Information Comprehension of Different Forms of Diabetes Education Materials Under Different Reading Scenarios Association Between Socio-Emotional Health, Physical Activity and Screen Time Among Children Teacher-Preschool Student Relationships and Their Associations with Child Mental Health Problems Enhancing College Students’ Well-Being through an Online Mindfulness Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study Respiratory Health and Underlying Tobacco Use Motives Among Cigarette Smokers and Hubble-Bubble Pipe Consumers: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1