A Comparison of Indigenous Sport for Development Policy Directives in Canada and Australia

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-31 DOI:10.5663/APS.V7I2.29334
K. Gardam, A. Giles, S. Rynne, L. Hayhurst
{"title":"A Comparison of Indigenous Sport for Development Policy Directives in Canada and Australia","authors":"K. Gardam, A. Giles, S. Rynne, L. Hayhurst","doi":"10.5663/APS.V7I2.29334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we employ Bacchi’s (2012) “What’s the Problem Represented to be” approach to guide our discourse analysis of federal Indigenous sport for development (SFD) policies in Canada and Australia.  Through a review of government policies and reports, we highlight the often-divergent policy directives set out by federal departments in these two countries.  Namely, inter-departmental partnerships in areas such as health, education, and justice fail to be adequately facilitated through SFD policies in Canada, while, conversely, Australia has strived towards greater federal partnership building.  Within the identified Canadian and Australian policies, both countries consistently produced sport as having the potential to contribute to Indigenous peoples’ social and economic development, thus highlighting the growing institutional support behind Indigenous SFD.  This policy analysis research provides a novel contribution to the overall growing body of literature investigating the politics of partnership building in SFD initiatives. ","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5663/APS.V7I2.29334","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5663/APS.V7I2.29334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study, we employ Bacchi’s (2012) “What’s the Problem Represented to be” approach to guide our discourse analysis of federal Indigenous sport for development (SFD) policies in Canada and Australia.  Through a review of government policies and reports, we highlight the often-divergent policy directives set out by federal departments in these two countries.  Namely, inter-departmental partnerships in areas such as health, education, and justice fail to be adequately facilitated through SFD policies in Canada, while, conversely, Australia has strived towards greater federal partnership building.  Within the identified Canadian and Australian policies, both countries consistently produced sport as having the potential to contribute to Indigenous peoples’ social and economic development, thus highlighting the growing institutional support behind Indigenous SFD.  This policy analysis research provides a novel contribution to the overall growing body of literature investigating the politics of partnership building in SFD initiatives. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大和澳大利亚土著体育促进发展政策指示的比较
在这项研究中,我们采用了Bacchi(2012)的“代表的问题是什么”方法来指导我们对加拿大和澳大利亚联邦土著体育促进发展(SFD)政策的话语分析。通过对政府政策和报告的审查,我们强调了这两个国家的联邦部门制定的政策指令往往存在分歧。也就是说,加拿大的SFD政策未能充分促进卫生、教育和司法等领域的跨部门伙伴关系,而相反,澳大利亚一直在努力加强联邦伙伴关系建设。在加拿大和澳大利亚确定的政策范围内,两国一直认为体育有可能促进土著人民的社会和经济发展,从而突出了土著可持续发展背后日益增长的体制支持。这项政策分析研究为越来越多的研究SFD倡议中伙伴关系建设政治的文献提供了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aboriginal Policy Studies
Aboriginal Policy Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Identity Fraud: An Interview with Caroline Tait Analysis of Crime, Incarceration, Victimization and Employment of Indigenous Persons in Canada from 2015 to 2021 NAISA Council Statement on Indigenous Identity Fraud From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada Remaining Unreconciled: Philanthropy and Indigenous Governance in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1