Foster Parents’ Readiness for the Implementation of Foster Family Pedagogy

M. Gorina, O. Ivanova, Mārīte Kravale-Pauliņa
{"title":"Foster Parents’ Readiness for the Implementation of Foster Family Pedagogy","authors":"M. Gorina, O. Ivanova, Mārīte Kravale-Pauliņa","doi":"10.2478/jtes-2020-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It can be observed that changing attitude towards the environment and fellow human beings manifests itself as a socially unsustainable relationship, which in different ways and at different levels manifests itself in social exclusion. Social exclusion is increasingly emerging as a phenomenon that is complex in nature and its solutions must be sought in the wicked problem approach, which is characteristic of complex problems and has significant ontological roots. At present, ontology should consider the much more complicated problem of what types of being are formed by both the natural and the cultural evolutionary processes. It can be argued that evolutionary ontology attempts to create a new image of the world and of humans – a new non-anthropocentric cosmology, i.e., a consistently philosophical culturological cosmology that takes into account reality in its real structure as a conflict between the spontaneous activity of nature and the socio-cultural activity of humans (Šmajs, 2008, p. 96). The reasons for social exclusion can be different, and its specific manifestations are various, and the same can be said about the phenomenon of social inclusion, which is the expression of the quality of other relationships and attitudes. Externally observable signs of social exclusion are more closely related to the concept of families at risk. A social risk family can be defined as a family that experiences difficult problems and has limited opportunities to provide favorable living conditions for the comprehensive development of all family members. More and more often it is associated with unsustainable cultural or non-cultural contexts, mainly related to non-ecological culture prosperity in the consumer society. It can be noted that this context in its current form (which includes manufacturing, consumption, material culture, and technology, and both the social, intellectual, and material life of humans) is quite anti-natural oriented in its principle. Unfortunately, the aggressive anti-natural sociocultural strategy permeated also the field of human upbringing and education (Šmajs, 2008, p. 194). At the beginning of the 21st century, it has emerged as the Anthropocene era in a broader sense, in which the geological characterization of the era is complemented by the characterization of the sustainability of public relations in a broader holistic perspective. The aim of the article is to consider a number of real cases in a broader perspective from the point of view of foster family pedagogy, identify the choice of foster care approaches and evaluate the results obtained. From the perspective of foster family pedagogy, foster parents and foster children are participants in the lifelong learning process, where the mutual influence and interaction of foster parents and foster children are studied. The authors evaluated real situations from the perspective of foster family pedagogy and children’s involvement in the family structure. The article also examines the influence of the foster family and its readiness to overcome the effects of Anthropocene unsustainability.","PeriodicalId":39400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract It can be observed that changing attitude towards the environment and fellow human beings manifests itself as a socially unsustainable relationship, which in different ways and at different levels manifests itself in social exclusion. Social exclusion is increasingly emerging as a phenomenon that is complex in nature and its solutions must be sought in the wicked problem approach, which is characteristic of complex problems and has significant ontological roots. At present, ontology should consider the much more complicated problem of what types of being are formed by both the natural and the cultural evolutionary processes. It can be argued that evolutionary ontology attempts to create a new image of the world and of humans – a new non-anthropocentric cosmology, i.e., a consistently philosophical culturological cosmology that takes into account reality in its real structure as a conflict between the spontaneous activity of nature and the socio-cultural activity of humans (Šmajs, 2008, p. 96). The reasons for social exclusion can be different, and its specific manifestations are various, and the same can be said about the phenomenon of social inclusion, which is the expression of the quality of other relationships and attitudes. Externally observable signs of social exclusion are more closely related to the concept of families at risk. A social risk family can be defined as a family that experiences difficult problems and has limited opportunities to provide favorable living conditions for the comprehensive development of all family members. More and more often it is associated with unsustainable cultural or non-cultural contexts, mainly related to non-ecological culture prosperity in the consumer society. It can be noted that this context in its current form (which includes manufacturing, consumption, material culture, and technology, and both the social, intellectual, and material life of humans) is quite anti-natural oriented in its principle. Unfortunately, the aggressive anti-natural sociocultural strategy permeated also the field of human upbringing and education (Šmajs, 2008, p. 194). At the beginning of the 21st century, it has emerged as the Anthropocene era in a broader sense, in which the geological characterization of the era is complemented by the characterization of the sustainability of public relations in a broader holistic perspective. The aim of the article is to consider a number of real cases in a broader perspective from the point of view of foster family pedagogy, identify the choice of foster care approaches and evaluate the results obtained. From the perspective of foster family pedagogy, foster parents and foster children are participants in the lifelong learning process, where the mutual influence and interaction of foster parents and foster children are studied. The authors evaluated real situations from the perspective of foster family pedagogy and children’s involvement in the family structure. The article also examines the influence of the foster family and its readiness to overcome the effects of Anthropocene unsustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寄养父母对实施寄养家庭教学法的准备
可以观察到,对环境和人类同胞态度的变化表现为一种社会不可持续的关系,这种关系以不同的方式和不同的层次表现为社会排斥。社会排斥正日益成为一种复杂的现象,它的解决必须在邪恶问题方法中寻求,这是复杂问题的特征,具有重要的本体论根源。目前,本体论应该考虑更复杂的问题,即在自然和文化进化过程中形成了什么类型的存在。可以说,进化本体论试图创造一种世界和人类的新形象——一种新的非人类中心主义宇宙论,即一种一贯的哲学文化宇宙论,它将现实的真实结构视为自然自发活动与人类社会文化活动之间的冲突(Šmajs, 2008, p. 96)。社会排斥的原因可以不同,其具体表现形式也多种多样,社会包容现象也是如此,它是其他关系和态度质量的表达。外部可观察到的社会排斥迹象与处于危险中的家庭的概念更为密切相关。社会风险家庭可以定义为遇到困难的问题,并且为所有家庭成员的全面发展提供良好生活条件的机会有限的家庭。它越来越多地与不可持续的文化或非文化背景联系在一起,主要与消费社会的非生态文化繁荣有关。值得注意的是,当前形式的这种背景(包括制造、消费、物质文化和技术,以及人类的社会、智力和物质生活)在原则上是相当反自然的。不幸的是,激进的反自然的社会文化策略也渗透到人类养育和教育领域(Šmajs, 2008, p. 194)。21世纪初,出现了更广泛意义上的人类世(Anthropocene)时代,在更广泛的整体视角下,这个时代的地质学特征与公共关系可持续性特征相辅相成。本文的目的是从寄养家庭教育学的角度出发,从更广阔的视角来考虑一些真实的案例,确定寄养方法的选择,并评估所获得的结果。从寄养家庭教育学的角度来看,寄养父母和寄养儿童是终身学习过程的参与者,研究寄养父母和寄养儿童之间的相互影响和互动。作者从寄养家庭教育学和儿童参与家庭结构的角度对真实情况进行了评估。文章还探讨了寄养家庭的影响及其克服人类世不可持续性影响的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability (JTEFS) is a forum for the meeting of different views, ideas and research to promote the further development of studies and practice of teacher education in all areas of formal and non-formal education in relation to sustainability. Contributors are encouraged to submit articles with relevance to content and forms of teacher professional and academic education, problems and tasks of teacher in-service education and other issues to help teachers to become responsible mentors for the sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Online Adult Education for Sustainable Development: The Analysis of the Consequences of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Latvia Editorial: Does Sustainability Languish in Education? Social Ecology and Environmental Diversity in Teacher Education Tracing the Sustainability Components in the Indian Tourism Curricula: An Exploratory Study Developing an Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology for Disc Golf Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1