State ownership and performance of firm: evidence from India

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Public Sector Economics Pub Date : 2019-06-15 DOI:10.3326/PSE.43.2.4
O. Singh
{"title":"State ownership and performance of firm: evidence from India","authors":"O. Singh","doi":"10.3326/PSE.43.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, an analysis of the performance of public and private sector firms operating in five different industries over the period 2011 to 2015 has been made. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA), the performance has been measured in respect of technical efficiency. To compare the performance of public and private sector firms, two distinct methodologies have been used: independent samples t-test and the Tobit regression model. The results of t-test indicate that the private sector has significantly higher technical efficiency in two industries but in one industry is outperformed by the public sector. In the remaining two industries, both sectors are equally efficient or inefficient. While the results of the Tobit model show that even after controlling for the firm- and industry-specific characteristics as well as the scale effect, in three industries the public sector has a managerial efficiency significantly higher than the private sector, which is found to be more efficient only in one industry.","PeriodicalId":37447,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3326/PSE.43.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, an analysis of the performance of public and private sector firms operating in five different industries over the period 2011 to 2015 has been made. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA), the performance has been measured in respect of technical efficiency. To compare the performance of public and private sector firms, two distinct methodologies have been used: independent samples t-test and the Tobit regression model. The results of t-test indicate that the private sector has significantly higher technical efficiency in two industries but in one industry is outperformed by the public sector. In the remaining two industries, both sectors are equally efficient or inefficient. While the results of the Tobit model show that even after controlling for the firm- and industry-specific characteristics as well as the scale effect, in three industries the public sector has a managerial efficiency significantly higher than the private sector, which is found to be more efficient only in one industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国企与企业绩效:来自印度的证据
本文对2011年至2015年五个不同行业的公共和私营部门企业的绩效进行了分析。运用数据包络分析(DEA),从技术效率的角度对企业绩效进行了测度。为了比较公共部门和私营部门公司的绩效,使用了两种不同的方法:独立样本t检验和Tobit回归模型。t检验结果表明,私营部门在两个行业的技术效率显著高于公共部门,但在一个行业的技术效率优于公共部门。在剩下的两个行业中,这两个部门要么效率相当,要么效率不高。而Tobit模型的结果表明,即使在控制了企业和行业特征以及规模效应之后,在三个行业中,公共部门的管理效率显著高于私营部门,只有一个行业的管理效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Sector Economics
Public Sector Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Sector Economics is double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Institute of Public Finance, which seeks theoretical, empirical and policy-oriented contributions analysing the role and functioning of the public sector at macroeconomic, sectoral and microeconomic levels, in both advanced and emerging market economies. We also aim to provide a professional forum for the discussion of contemporary public policy issues and actively seek survey articles, appraisals of current policy debates, shorter notes and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
How can the preferences of policy makers be operationalised in optimum control problems with macroeconometric models? A case study for Slovenian fiscal policies Perceived unmet healthcare needs among older Europeans in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: the telemedicine solution Is the use of the investment resources allocated to municipalities in Cameroon efficient? Fiscal decentralization and gender equality: empirical evidence across countries Taxpayers' attitudes toward tax compliance in the Slovenian tax system: differences according to gender, income level and size of settlement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1