Factors related to public COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on the "3Cs" model: a cross-sectional study

Xiao Xi Liu, J. Dai, Hao Chen, Xiao Li, Suhong Chen, Yang Yu, Q. Zhao, Ru Wang, Yimeng Mao, H. Fu, Junling Gao, P. Zheng
{"title":"Factors related to public COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on the \"3Cs\" model: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Xiao Xi Liu, J. Dai, Hao Chen, Xiao Li, Suhong Chen, Yang Yu, Q. Zhao, Ru Wang, Yimeng Mao, H. Fu, Junling Gao, P. Zheng","doi":"10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8467.2021.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To understand the current situation of the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines among Chinese residents, analyze the factors of vaccine hesitancy based on the \"3Cs\" model, and to provide reference for population intervention. Methods: From Dec 31, 2020 to Jan 11, 2021, a convenience sampling method was adopted to conduct an online survey of residents in 34 provinces, cities and autonomous regions across the country.The survey content included demographic characteristics, vaccine hesitancy, and the dimensions of the \"3Cs\" (confidence, complacency, and convenience) model.We analyzed the influence of demographic characteristics on vaccine hesitancy by χ2 test.Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effects of \"3Cs\" variables on vaccine hesitancy. Results: A total of 2 531 respondents were surveyed.Their average age was (33.9±8.9) years old, male to female ratio was 1:1.42, and vaccine hesitating respondents accounted for 44.3%.Logistic regression analysis found that gender (ORfemale=1.33, 95%CI: 1.12-1.58), monthly income (compared with 10 000=1.57, 95%CI: 1.25-1.97), healthcare workers(ORno=1.39, 95%CI: 1.12-1.73), and confidence (OR=0.47, 95%CI: 0.40-0.56) and complacency (OR=2.49, 95%CI: 2.10-2.96) in the \"3Cs\" model showed statistically significant impacts on the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion: The confidence and complacency dimensions in the \"3Cs\" model have an impact on the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines.Future interventions can focus on improving the public's confidence and reducing complacency associated with COVID-19 vaccines to increase the vaccination rate. © 2021, Editorial Department of Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences. All right reserved.","PeriodicalId":12635,"journal":{"name":"复旦学报(医学版)","volume":"48 1","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"复旦学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8467.2021.03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: To understand the current situation of the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines among Chinese residents, analyze the factors of vaccine hesitancy based on the "3Cs" model, and to provide reference for population intervention. Methods: From Dec 31, 2020 to Jan 11, 2021, a convenience sampling method was adopted to conduct an online survey of residents in 34 provinces, cities and autonomous regions across the country.The survey content included demographic characteristics, vaccine hesitancy, and the dimensions of the "3Cs" (confidence, complacency, and convenience) model.We analyzed the influence of demographic characteristics on vaccine hesitancy by χ2 test.Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effects of "3Cs" variables on vaccine hesitancy. Results: A total of 2 531 respondents were surveyed.Their average age was (33.9±8.9) years old, male to female ratio was 1:1.42, and vaccine hesitating respondents accounted for 44.3%.Logistic regression analysis found that gender (ORfemale=1.33, 95%CI: 1.12-1.58), monthly income (compared with 10 000=1.57, 95%CI: 1.25-1.97), healthcare workers(ORno=1.39, 95%CI: 1.12-1.73), and confidence (OR=0.47, 95%CI: 0.40-0.56) and complacency (OR=2.49, 95%CI: 2.10-2.96) in the "3Cs" model showed statistically significant impacts on the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion: The confidence and complacency dimensions in the "3Cs" model have an impact on the hesitation of COVID-19 vaccines.Future interventions can focus on improving the public's confidence and reducing complacency associated with COVID-19 vaccines to increase the vaccination rate. © 2021, Editorial Department of Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences. All right reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于“3c”模型的公众COVID-19疫苗犹豫相关因素:一项横断面研究
目的:了解我国居民新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫的现状,基于“3Cs”模型分析疫苗犹豫的因素,为人群干预提供参考。方法:自2020年12月31日至2021年1月11日,采用方便抽样法对全国34个省、市、自治区的居民进行在线调查。调查内容包括人口统计学特征、疫苗犹豫和“3C”(信心、自满和便利)模型的维度。我们通过χ2检验分析了人口统计学特征对疫苗犹豫的影响。Logistic回归用于评估“3Cs”变量对疫苗犹豫的影响。结果:共有2531名受访者接受调查。他们的平均年龄为(33.9±8.9)岁,男女比例为1:1.42,对疫苗犹豫不决的受访者占44.3%。Logistic回归分析发现,性别(ORfemal=1.33,95%CI:1.12-1.58)、月收入(与10000相比=1.57,95%CI:1.25-1.97)、医护人员(ORno=1.39,95%CI:1.11-1.73),“3Cs”模型中的置信度(OR=0.47,95%CI:0.40-0.56)和自满情绪(OR=2.49,95%CI:2.10-2.96)对新冠肺炎疫苗的犹豫有统计学显著影响。结论:“3Cs”模型中的信心和自满维度对新冠肺炎疫苗的犹豫有影响。未来的干预措施可以侧重于提高公众的信心,减少与新冠肺炎疫苗相关的自满情绪,以提高疫苗接种率。©2021,《复旦大学医学科学杂志》编辑部。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
复旦学报(医学版)
复旦学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7922
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Factors related to public COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy based on the "3Cs" model: a cross-sectional study A cross-sectional survey on information access through hospital's official account on new media and its association with antenatal care knowledge and health behaviors of pregnant women under COVID-19 epidemic Public preference and vaccination willingness for COVID-19 vaccine in China Anxiety status and influencing factors of active psychological counselors in Shanghai under COVID-19 epidemic Cognition of the relationship between smoking and COVID-19 and its impact on daily cigarette consumption among smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1