Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Education Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580
Karl V. Healy, Solveig Weise, A. Fink, T. Frese, M. Richter, Anja Knöchelmann
{"title":"Learning Approaches as a Means to Understand Difficulties and Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Two German Educational Curricula","authors":"Karl V. Healy, Solveig Weise, A. Fink, T. Frese, M. Richter, Anja Knöchelmann","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars","PeriodicalId":46846,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"370 - 380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2120580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves disease-specific markers (HbA1c levels and bodyweight) and prevents disease-related complications. Yet, patients do not seem to benefit equally from such education, likely because of differences in approaches to learning. Purpose We investigated which learning approaches are best addressed by diabetes curricula and suggest improvements in curriculum design. Methods Two of the most popular German type 2 DSME curricula were studied. We used qualitative content analysis to build a systematic coding frame, extracting and connecting categories of meaning from the material. Criteria for categories were drawn from research on learning preferences in adult Germans. Results Both curricula mainly address participants preferring educator-guided and application-driven learning. One of the curricula more actively involves its participants with open discussions and personal goal-setting and shows a stronger emphasis on social support strategies. Discussion Different learning approaches are not met equally in the curricula, which might create unique difficulties for participants of DSME. Translation to Health Education Practice Introducing personal goal-setting and progress monitoring in DSME should benefit participants with passive approaches to learning. Offering additional course material could diversify teaching methods and satisfy theoretically driven people. All DSME programs should emphasize social support strategies. A AJHE Self-Study quiz is online for this article via the SHAPE America Online Institute (SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学习方法了解2型糖尿病自我管理训练的困难与机会:两项德国教育课程的质性内容分析
背景糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)可改善疾病特异性标志物(HbA1c水平和体重)并预防疾病相关并发症。然而,患者似乎并没有平等地从这种教育中受益,可能是因为学习方法的差异。目的:我们调查了糖尿病课程最适合哪些学习方法,并对课程设计提出了改进建议。方法对德国最流行的2型DSME课程进行研究。我们采用定性的内容分析方法构建了系统的编码框架,从材料中提取并连接了意义范畴。分类的标准来自对德国成年人学习偏好的研究。结果这两种课程主要针对倾向于教育者引导和应用驱动学习的参与者。其中一个课程更积极地让参与者参与公开讨论和个人目标设定,并更加强调社会支持战略。不同的学习方法在课程中并没有得到平等的满足,这可能会给DSME的参与者带来独特的困难。在DSME中引入个人目标设定和进度监测应该有利于采用被动学习方法的参与者。提供额外的课程材料可以使教学方法多样化,并满足理论驱动的人。所有DSME项目都应强调社会支持策略。本文通过SHAPE美国在线研究所(SAOI) http://portal.shapeamerica.org/trn-Webinars提供了一个AJHE自学测验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Education
American Journal of Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: AJHE is sponsored by the American Association for Health Education of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The mission of the American Association for Health Education(AAHE) is to advance the profession by serving health educators and others who strive to promote the health of all people through education and other systematic strategies.AAHE addresses the following priorities •Develop and promulgate standards, resources and services regarding health education to professionals and non-professionals •Foster the development of national research priorities in health education and promotion. Provide mechanisms for the translation and interaction between theory, research and practice.
期刊最新文献
College Students’ Preference and Information Comprehension of Different Forms of Diabetes Education Materials Under Different Reading Scenarios Association Between Socio-Emotional Health, Physical Activity and Screen Time Among Children Teacher-Preschool Student Relationships and Their Associations with Child Mental Health Problems Enhancing College Students’ Well-Being through an Online Mindfulness Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study Respiratory Health and Underlying Tobacco Use Motives Among Cigarette Smokers and Hubble-Bubble Pipe Consumers: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1