{"title":"Ação, ordem e cultura: fundamentos de um programa de pesquisa weberiano","authors":"Wolfgang Schluchter","doi":"10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than interpreting, it is necessary to develop Max Weber. Based on this premise, the article situates the current state of the current theoretical discussion in sociology and presents ten key points for the construction of a Weber paradigm or a Weberian research program.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":"19 1","pages":"19-55"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p19","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
More than interpreting, it is necessary to develop Max Weber. Based on this premise, the article situates the current state of the current theoretical discussion in sociology and presents ten key points for the construction of a Weber paradigm or a Weberian research program.
期刊介绍:
Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.