Evaluate the follow-up effect of drug treatment for middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic plaques using high resolution MRI

Xuefeng Zhang, Shuai Li, Zhang Shi, Shiyue Chen, Q. Zhan, Wenjia Peng, X. Tian, Qi Liu, Jianping Lu
{"title":"Evaluate the follow-up effect of drug treatment for middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic plaques using high resolution MRI","authors":"Xuefeng Zhang, Shuai Li, Zhang Shi, Shiyue Chen, Q. Zhan, Wenjia Peng, X. Tian, Qi Liu, Jianping Lu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN112149-20190415-00288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the value of 3.0 T high resolution MRI (HR-MRI) in the follow-up of drug treatment in acute and non-acute ischemic stroke caused by middle cerebral artery (MCA) plaque. \n \n \nMethods \nThe perspective study enrolled patients with ischemic stroke caused by MCA stenosis from October 2012 to October 2015 in the department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University. All the patients underwent HR-MRI and then were divided into acute and non-acute stroke groups according to the intervels of the last symptom onset to the time of HR-MRI examination. All patients were informed consent to receive antiplatelet drug and intensive lipid therapy and followed up with HR-MRI. The HR-MRI sequence including T2WI, T1WI and contrast-enhanced T1WI of vessel wall, and T2WI and DWI of brain were routinely performed. T-test of paired samples was used to evaluate the changes of stenosis rate of vascular lumen, plaque enhancement degree, plaque volume and plaque burden on HR-MRI, and the NIHSS score of nervous system and blood biochemical indicators of the patients before and after treatment. Chi square test was used to compare the difference in ischemic event recurrcence between the acute and the non-acute stroke group. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 31 acute stroke patients and 20 non-acute stroke patients were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up time of acute stroke group was (671.71±522.86) days. Compare with the baseline, the stenosis rate of vascular lumen (P=0.039), plaque enhancement degree (P 0.05). There were no significant changes in NIHSS score of nervous system, TC, triglyceride (TG) and LDL-C (P>0.05), however the high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was significantly increased than that in the baseline (P=0.02). During the follow-up period, no new cerebral infarction was found in the DWI images of the two groups. Six patients had transient ischemic attack (TIA) recurrence in the acute stroke group and 5 patients in the non-acute stroke group, there was no significant difference between both groups(χ2=0.229, P= 0.632). \n \n \nConclusion \nHR-MRI can be used as an important evaluation method for the follow-up of MCA atherosclerotic plaque therapy. After antiplatelet therapy and intensive lipid-lowering therapy, the plaque volume and burden of MCA offending plaque, and plaque enhancement decreased in acute stroke patients but there was no significant change in non-acute patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nAtherosclerosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke; Follow-up studies","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN112149-20190415-00288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of 3.0 T high resolution MRI (HR-MRI) in the follow-up of drug treatment in acute and non-acute ischemic stroke caused by middle cerebral artery (MCA) plaque. Methods The perspective study enrolled patients with ischemic stroke caused by MCA stenosis from October 2012 to October 2015 in the department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University. All the patients underwent HR-MRI and then were divided into acute and non-acute stroke groups according to the intervels of the last symptom onset to the time of HR-MRI examination. All patients were informed consent to receive antiplatelet drug and intensive lipid therapy and followed up with HR-MRI. The HR-MRI sequence including T2WI, T1WI and contrast-enhanced T1WI of vessel wall, and T2WI and DWI of brain were routinely performed. T-test of paired samples was used to evaluate the changes of stenosis rate of vascular lumen, plaque enhancement degree, plaque volume and plaque burden on HR-MRI, and the NIHSS score of nervous system and blood biochemical indicators of the patients before and after treatment. Chi square test was used to compare the difference in ischemic event recurrcence between the acute and the non-acute stroke group. Results A total of 31 acute stroke patients and 20 non-acute stroke patients were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up time of acute stroke group was (671.71±522.86) days. Compare with the baseline, the stenosis rate of vascular lumen (P=0.039), plaque enhancement degree (P 0.05). There were no significant changes in NIHSS score of nervous system, TC, triglyceride (TG) and LDL-C (P>0.05), however the high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was significantly increased than that in the baseline (P=0.02). During the follow-up period, no new cerebral infarction was found in the DWI images of the two groups. Six patients had transient ischemic attack (TIA) recurrence in the acute stroke group and 5 patients in the non-acute stroke group, there was no significant difference between both groups(χ2=0.229, P= 0.632). Conclusion HR-MRI can be used as an important evaluation method for the follow-up of MCA atherosclerotic plaque therapy. After antiplatelet therapy and intensive lipid-lowering therapy, the plaque volume and burden of MCA offending plaque, and plaque enhancement decreased in acute stroke patients but there was no significant change in non-acute patients. Key words: Atherosclerosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke; Follow-up studies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用高分辨率MRI评价大脑中动脉粥样硬化斑块药物治疗的随访效果
目的探讨3.0 T高分辨率MRI (HR-MRI)在大脑中动脉(MCA)斑块引起的急性和非急性缺血性脑卒中药物治疗随访中的价值。方法前瞻性研究纳入2012年10月至2015年10月海军医科大学附属长海医院神经外科因MCA狭窄致缺血性脑卒中患者。所有患者均行HR-MRI检查,然后根据最后一次症状发作至HR-MRI检查时间的间隔时间分为急性和非急性脑卒中组。所有患者均知情同意接受抗血小板药物和强化脂质治疗,并进行HR-MRI随访。常规进行HR-MRI序列检查,包括血管壁T2WI、T1WI及增强T1WI,脑部T2WI、DWI。采用配对样本t检验,评价患者治疗前后血管腔狭窄率、斑块强化程度、斑块体积、斑块负担的HR-MRI变化,以及神经系统和血液生化指标NIHSS评分的变化。采用卡方检验比较急性和非急性脑卒中组缺血性事件复发率的差异。结果共纳入31例急性脑卒中患者和20例非急性脑卒中患者。急性脑卒中组平均随访时间为(671.71±522.86)d。与基线比较,血管腔狭窄率(P=0.039)、斑块增强程度(P 0.05)。两组神经系统、TC、甘油三酯(TG)、LDL-C NIHSS评分无显著变化(P < 0.05),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)较基线显著升高(P=0.02)。随访期间,两组DWI均未见新发脑梗死。急性脑卒中组有6例短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)复发,非急性脑卒中组有5例,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.229, P= 0.632)。结论磁共振成像可作为MCA动脉粥样硬化斑块治疗随访的重要评价手段。急性脑卒中患者经抗血小板治疗和强化降脂治疗后,MCA责任斑块的斑块体积、负担和斑块增强均有所下降,而非急性脑卒中患者无明显变化。关键词:动脉粥样硬化;磁共振成像;中风;后续研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
期刊最新文献
Study progress of cerebrovascular interventional surgery robot Value of chest CT screening in the early COVID-19 outbreak Imaging dynamic observation of cured COVID-19 patients with imported coronavirus pneumonia/ 输入性新型冠状病毒肺炎治愈患者肺内病变的影像学动态观察 The diagnostic value of chest CT imaging in differential diagnosis between common-type COVID-19 and mycoplasma pneumonia/ 胸部CT在普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎与支原体肺炎鉴别诊断中的价值 The role of medical imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1