Digital agriculture killjoy: happy objects and cruel quests for the good life

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Sociologia Ruralis Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1111/soru.12398
M. Carolan
{"title":"Digital agriculture killjoy: happy objects and cruel quests for the good life","authors":"M. Carolan","doi":"10.1111/soru.12398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings together phenomena not often connected in the rural studies cannon to show an underlying relationality connecting digital agriculture, conceptions of the good life and pursuits of happiness. Drawing from the scholarship of Sara Ahmed and Lauren Berlant, Agriculture 4.0 technologies are described as 'cruel' happiness pointers. These platforms are shown to direct actors towards happiness while potentially accelerating the very conditions that produced the problems they are promising to solve. Highlighting conceptions of the good life that are fluid, contested and multiple, which have connections to sayings and doings associated with these platforms, the analysis makes visible norms and values animating the so-called digital revolution. At the same time, the article interrogates what these changing affective politics means for the future of farming and farm-based identities, at least in Western countries. The data analysed, from individuals who had adopted smart farming applications in the US, were collected from focus groups and personal interviews, the latter conducted pre (2019) and post coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak (2020 and 2021).","PeriodicalId":47985,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia Ruralis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia Ruralis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article brings together phenomena not often connected in the rural studies cannon to show an underlying relationality connecting digital agriculture, conceptions of the good life and pursuits of happiness. Drawing from the scholarship of Sara Ahmed and Lauren Berlant, Agriculture 4.0 technologies are described as 'cruel' happiness pointers. These platforms are shown to direct actors towards happiness while potentially accelerating the very conditions that produced the problems they are promising to solve. Highlighting conceptions of the good life that are fluid, contested and multiple, which have connections to sayings and doings associated with these platforms, the analysis makes visible norms and values animating the so-called digital revolution. At the same time, the article interrogates what these changing affective politics means for the future of farming and farm-based identities, at least in Western countries. The data analysed, from individuals who had adopted smart farming applications in the US, were collected from focus groups and personal interviews, the latter conducted pre (2019) and post coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak (2020 and 2021).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字农业扼杀快乐:美好生活的快乐对象与残酷追求
本文汇集了农村研究领域中不常联系的现象,以展示数字农业、美好生活观念和幸福追求之间的潜在关系。根据萨拉·艾哈迈德和劳伦·伯兰特的研究,农业4.0技术被描述为“残酷的”幸福指标。事实证明,这些平台在引导参与者走向幸福的同时,也潜在地加速了产生这些平台承诺要解决的问题的条件。该分析突出了流动的、有争议的和多元的美好生活概念,这些概念与与这些平台相关的言论和行为有关,使可见的规范和价值观激发了所谓的数字革命。与此同时,这篇文章还探讨了这些不断变化的情感政治对农业和以农场为基础的身份的未来意味着什么,至少在西方国家是这样。分析的数据来自美国采用智能农业应用的个人,收集自焦点小组和个人访谈,后者在冠状病毒(COVID-19)爆发之前(2019年)和之后(2020年和2021年)进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia Ruralis
Sociologia Ruralis Multiple-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Sociologia Ruralis reflects the diversity of European social-science research on rural areas and related issues. The complexity and diversity of rural problems require multi and interdisciplinary approaches. Over the past 40 years Sociologia Ruralis has been an international forum for social scientists engaged in a wide variety of disciplines focusing on social, political and cultural aspects of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis covers a wide range of subjects, ranging from farming, natural resources and food systems to rural communities, rural identities and the restructuring of rurality.
期刊最新文献
New immigration destinations in Sweden: Migrant residential trajectories intersecting rural areas Sacred serpents and the discourse on conservation: Interrogating interspecies dynamics in rural Bardhaman Stewardship and everyday governance: Managing materialities in a south‐eastern village community, Estonia Rethinking class, capitalism and exploitation from the perspective of family farming in Aotearoa/New Zealand Personal, peaceful, progressive: Integration workers’ narratives of refugee settlement and the rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1