Interlaboratory Comparisons of Calibration Results of the Measures of Electrical Resistance of Direct Current

O. Velychko, V. Dovgan, D. Nikitenko, Ia. Brezytskyi
{"title":"Interlaboratory Comparisons of Calibration Results of the Measures of Electrical Resistance of Direct Current","authors":"O. Velychko, V. Dovgan, D. Nikitenko, Ia. Brezytskyi","doi":"10.33955/2307-2180(2)2018.25-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the accredited calibration laboratories in Ukraine, a second round of inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) of the results of calibration of electrical resistance measures of direct current was conduc­ted. It is important to conduct such rounds of ILC of results with the involvement of an increasing number of calibration laboratories. This will, accordingly, establish the competence of an increasing number of calibration laboratories, which is quite relevant today. The article presents the results of the first round of ILC of the measures of electric resistance 1 Ohm, 10 Ohm and 100 Ohm on a direct current. As an comparison examples by reference laboratory measurement of electrical resistance of direct current P321 and P331, which were already used in the first round of ILC, were selected. The reference labo­ratory has research the measures of electrical resistance as a means of comparison, defined the reference values of comparison with the calculation of their extended uncertainties according to the mea­surement model. The comparison of the results of measurements obtained during the calibration of the measures of electrical resistance of eight laboratories took place according to the radial scheme from 2018 to 2019. The deviations of the results obtained by each laboratory were determined and their correctness was evaluated taking into account the uncertainty of measurements by one of the criteria for performance statistics for the selected electrical resistance ra­tings. The obtained En values show that for all laboratories participating satisfy the set criterion, except for the result of one laboratory for electrical resistance of 10 Ohms. A comparative analysis of the results of the calibration of resistance measures for laboratories that took part in the first and second rounds was carried out.","PeriodicalId":52864,"journal":{"name":"Metrologiia ta priladi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologiia ta priladi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33955/2307-2180(2)2018.25-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For the accredited calibration laboratories in Ukraine, a second round of inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) of the results of calibration of electrical resistance measures of direct current was conduc­ted. It is important to conduct such rounds of ILC of results with the involvement of an increasing number of calibration laboratories. This will, accordingly, establish the competence of an increasing number of calibration laboratories, which is quite relevant today. The article presents the results of the first round of ILC of the measures of electric resistance 1 Ohm, 10 Ohm and 100 Ohm on a direct current. As an comparison examples by reference laboratory measurement of electrical resistance of direct current P321 and P331, which were already used in the first round of ILC, were selected. The reference labo­ratory has research the measures of electrical resistance as a means of comparison, defined the reference values of comparison with the calculation of their extended uncertainties according to the mea­surement model. The comparison of the results of measurements obtained during the calibration of the measures of electrical resistance of eight laboratories took place according to the radial scheme from 2018 to 2019. The deviations of the results obtained by each laboratory were determined and their correctness was evaluated taking into account the uncertainty of measurements by one of the criteria for performance statistics for the selected electrical resistance ra­tings. The obtained En values show that for all laboratories participating satisfy the set criterion, except for the result of one laboratory for electrical resistance of 10 Ohms. A comparative analysis of the results of the calibration of resistance measures for laboratories that took part in the first and second rounds was carried out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直流电阻测量校准结果的实验室间比较
对于乌克兰认可的校正实验室,对直流电阻测量校正结果进行了第二轮实验室间比较。重要的是在越来越多的校准实验室参与的情况下进行这类结果的综合分析。因此,这将建立越来越多的校准实验室的能力,这在今天是非常相关的。本文介绍了直流1欧姆、10欧姆和100欧姆电阻测量的第一轮ILC结果。选取第一轮ILC中已经使用的直流电源P321和P331作为参考实验室电阻测量的对比实例。参考实验室研究了电阻测量作为比较手段,根据测量模型确定了比较参考值,并计算了它们的扩展不确定度。对2018年至2019年按径向方案校准八个实验室电阻测量的测量结果进行了比较。确定每个实验室获得的结果的偏差,并根据所选电阻额定值的性能统计标准之一考虑测量的不确定性,评估其正确性。所得的En值表明,除了一个实验室的电阻为10欧姆的结果外,所有参与的实验室都满足设定的标准。对参加第一轮和第二轮工作的实验室的耐药性措施校准结果进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
State Primary Standard of Gas Volume and Flow Rate Units for the Pressure Range of 1 MPa to 5 MPa (PVTt-15) THE ARTICLE IS ELLIMINATED Evaluation of the Signal Power Spectrum in Directional Receiving Systems Non-Selective Magnetoelectric Thermal Radiation Receiver Based on Cadmium Antimonide Features, Opportunities and Application of Control Cards Accumulated Sum. Part 2. Numerical Method for Assessing the Disorder of a Technological Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1