Hybrid in Form, Socialist in Content: The Formal Politics of Chŏlga in the North Korean Revolutionary Opera Sea of Blood

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1017/S1478572221000190
Stephen Johnson
{"title":"Hybrid in Form, Socialist in Content: The Formal Politics of Chŏlga in the North Korean Revolutionary Opera Sea of Blood","authors":"Stephen Johnson","doi":"10.1017/S1478572221000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Kim Jong Il considered the 1971 premiere of the opera Sea of Blood a watershed moment in opera history. He lauded its innovative use of chŏlga (‘stanzaic song’) rather than aria and recitative. By Western analytical standards, however, chŏlga is simple and predictable, so scholars have thus far glossed over its conventions and their signification. This article instead argues that chŏlga conventions exhibit cultural hybridity and that Kim leveraged such hybridity to advocate a modern, popular, and national sound for North Korea. I begin by outlining hybrid characteristics of colonial-era popular music that chŏlga inherited. I then explore Kim's engagement with such trends in his speeches on chŏlga and demonstrate that cultural hybridity was central to his understanding of sonic modernity. Finally, I analyse a scene from Sea of Blood that pits chŏlga against other music genres, leading to a symbolic victory for the form and for the Korean nation.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":"18 1","pages":"419 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572221000190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Kim Jong Il considered the 1971 premiere of the opera Sea of Blood a watershed moment in opera history. He lauded its innovative use of chŏlga (‘stanzaic song’) rather than aria and recitative. By Western analytical standards, however, chŏlga is simple and predictable, so scholars have thus far glossed over its conventions and their signification. This article instead argues that chŏlga conventions exhibit cultural hybridity and that Kim leveraged such hybridity to advocate a modern, popular, and national sound for North Korea. I begin by outlining hybrid characteristics of colonial-era popular music that chŏlga inherited. I then explore Kim's engagement with such trends in his speeches on chŏlga and demonstrate that cultural hybridity was central to his understanding of sonic modernity. Finally, I analyse a scene from Sea of Blood that pits chŏlga against other music genres, leading to a symbolic victory for the form and for the Korean nation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形式上的混合,内容上的社会主义:朝鲜革命歌剧《血海》中Chŏlga的形式政治
摘要金正日认为1971年歌剧《血海》的首演是歌剧史上的一个分水岭。他称赞它对chŏlga(“山歌”)的创新使用,而不是咏叹调和朗诵。然而,按照西方的分析标准,chŏlga是简单和可预测的,因此到目前为止,学者们已经掩盖了它的惯例及其含义。相反,这篇文章认为,chŏlga公约表现出文化的混合性,金利用这种混合性为朝鲜倡导现代、流行和民族的声音。我首先概述了chŏlga继承的殖民时代流行音乐的混合特征。然后,我在金关于chŏlga的演讲中探讨了他对这些趋势的参与,并证明了文化融合是他理解声音现代性的核心。最后,我分析了《血海》中的一个场景,该场景将chŏlga与其他音乐流派进行了对比,为这种形式和朝鲜民族带来了象征性的胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney Whiteness and the Problem of Colourblind Listening: Revisiting Leonard Feather's 1951 Blindfold Test with Roy Eldridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1