Normalizing novel sanitation practices in transitioning towards circular food and energy systems

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Sociology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1080/23251042.2022.2047325
Martijn Stehouwer, S. Wertheim-Heck, Bas van Vliet
{"title":"Normalizing novel sanitation practices in transitioning towards circular food and energy systems","authors":"Martijn Stehouwer, S. Wertheim-Heck, Bas van Vliet","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2022.2047325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wastewater from sanitation contains several scarce resources that can be reused for purposes of energy and food production. Sanitation infrastructures, however, are often overlooked in debates on circular food systems, while the role of sanitation could be pivotal in combatting resource depletion facing agriculture. Transitioning sanitation infrastructures to support circular systems also needs a thorough understanding of the sanitation practices involved, as resource-oriented sanitation systems require a de-routinization in how we make use of toilets and deal with wastewater. Instead, novel sanitation practices are needed for circular developments around sanitation to ensure the reuse potential of wastewater. This research paper focuses on exploring how sanitation practices are shaped and embedded in wider configurations of domestic practices and its implications for the routinization of novel sanitation practices. A mixed-method research design has been adopted studying sanitation practices and infrastructures in three distinct neighborhoods within the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region. First, a survey was conducted that enabled the development of a neighborhood typology. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted to uncover the embeddedness of sanitation practices. Results highlight the importance of normalizing novel sanitation practices when linking sanitation to food systems and list five steppingstones that may help doing so.","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2047325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wastewater from sanitation contains several scarce resources that can be reused for purposes of energy and food production. Sanitation infrastructures, however, are often overlooked in debates on circular food systems, while the role of sanitation could be pivotal in combatting resource depletion facing agriculture. Transitioning sanitation infrastructures to support circular systems also needs a thorough understanding of the sanitation practices involved, as resource-oriented sanitation systems require a de-routinization in how we make use of toilets and deal with wastewater. Instead, novel sanitation practices are needed for circular developments around sanitation to ensure the reuse potential of wastewater. This research paper focuses on exploring how sanitation practices are shaped and embedded in wider configurations of domestic practices and its implications for the routinization of novel sanitation practices. A mixed-method research design has been adopted studying sanitation practices and infrastructures in three distinct neighborhoods within the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region. First, a survey was conducted that enabled the development of a neighborhood typology. Second, in-depth interviews were conducted to uncover the embeddedness of sanitation practices. Results highlight the importance of normalizing novel sanitation practices when linking sanitation to food systems and list five steppingstones that may help doing so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在向循环食品和能源系统过渡的过程中规范新的卫生做法
卫生废水含有几种稀缺资源,可重复用于能源和食品生产。然而,在关于循环粮食系统的辩论中,卫生基础设施往往被忽视,而卫生设施在应对农业面临的资源枯竭方面的作用可能至关重要。将卫生基础设施转变为支持循环系统还需要彻底了解所涉及的卫生做法,因为以资源为导向的卫生系统需要在如何使用厕所和处理废水方面去常规化。相反,围绕卫生的循环发展需要新的卫生实践,以确保废水的再利用潜力。这篇研究论文的重点是探讨卫生实践是如何形成和嵌入更广泛的国内实践中的,以及它对新的卫生实践的常规化的影响。采用混合方法研究设计,研究阿姆斯特丹大都会区内三个不同社区的卫生实践和基础设施。首先,进行了一项调查,使社区类型学得以发展。其次,进行了深入访谈,以揭示卫生做法的内在性。研究结果强调了在将环境卫生与粮食系统联系起来时,规范新的环境卫生做法的重要性,并列出了可能有助于做到这一点的五个基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sociology
Environmental Sociology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.
期刊最新文献
Place-based understanding of Chilika fishery: power, affect, and materiality When water policies derail livelihood aspirations: farmers’ agency in everyday politics in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta Driving environmental inequality: the unequal harms and benefits of highways Acting on climate change concerns: lay perceptions of possibility, complexity and constraint Is an urban waste-to-energy plant a “green” megaproject? The power of narratives in shaping the city: a Danish case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1