Regeneration at a distance from the state: From radical imaginaries to alternative practices in Dutch farming

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Sociologia Ruralis Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.1111/soru.12403
Stephen Leitheiser, I. Horlings, A. Franklin, Elen-Maarja Trell
{"title":"Regeneration at a distance from the state: From radical imaginaries to alternative practices in Dutch farming","authors":"Stephen Leitheiser, I. Horlings, A. Franklin, Elen-Maarja Trell","doi":"10.1111/soru.12403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article combines a ‘zoomed-out’ political economic analysis of Dutch agriculture with a more ‘zoomed-in’ empirical exploration of small new entrant farmers who are carving out space for alternative food networks and practices in the Netherlands. Developing a concept of proto-regenerative imaginaries, we define proto-regenerative farmers as those farmers whose work is driven by a desire to contribute to social and ecological well-being. The use of the term ‘regenerative’ does not imply just the use of practices associated with ‘regenerative agriculture’, but to regeneration as a holistic framework rooted in a paradigm of care in which productive activities (e.g., agroecology) go hand in hand with the reproduction of social and ecological well-being. Data comes from an in-depth ethnographic study on a peri-urban farm that expanded to other farms and initiatives ( n = 5) within the network. Strategies used by farmers to carve out these spaces of regeneration include de-commodification of their produce through ‘solidarity payment’ schemes, the forging of reciprocal relationships and networks with other farmers, and","PeriodicalId":47985,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia Ruralis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia Ruralis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article combines a ‘zoomed-out’ political economic analysis of Dutch agriculture with a more ‘zoomed-in’ empirical exploration of small new entrant farmers who are carving out space for alternative food networks and practices in the Netherlands. Developing a concept of proto-regenerative imaginaries, we define proto-regenerative farmers as those farmers whose work is driven by a desire to contribute to social and ecological well-being. The use of the term ‘regenerative’ does not imply just the use of practices associated with ‘regenerative agriculture’, but to regeneration as a holistic framework rooted in a paradigm of care in which productive activities (e.g., agroecology) go hand in hand with the reproduction of social and ecological well-being. Data comes from an in-depth ethnographic study on a peri-urban farm that expanded to other farms and initiatives ( n = 5) within the network. Strategies used by farmers to carve out these spaces of regeneration include de-commodification of their produce through ‘solidarity payment’ schemes, the forging of reciprocal relationships and networks with other farmers, and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远离国家的再生:从激进的想象到荷兰农业的替代实践
这篇文章结合了对荷兰农业的“放大”政治经济分析,以及对新进入荷兰的小农户的更“放大”的实证探索,他们正在为荷兰的替代食品网络和实践开辟空间。在发展原始再生想象的概念时,我们将原始再生农民定义为那些工作是出于对社会和生态福祉做出贡献的愿望的农民。“再生”一词的使用不仅意味着使用与“再生农业”相关的实践,还意味着再生是一个植根于护理范式的整体框架,在这种范式中,生产活动(如农业生态学)与社会和生态福祉的再生产齐头并进。数据来自对一个城郊农场的深入民族志研究,该研究扩展到网络内的其他农场和倡议(n=5)。农民用来开拓这些再生空间的策略包括通过“团结支付”计划将其产品去商品化,与其他农民建立互惠关系和网络,以及
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia Ruralis
Sociologia Ruralis Multiple-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Sociologia Ruralis reflects the diversity of European social-science research on rural areas and related issues. The complexity and diversity of rural problems require multi and interdisciplinary approaches. Over the past 40 years Sociologia Ruralis has been an international forum for social scientists engaged in a wide variety of disciplines focusing on social, political and cultural aspects of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis covers a wide range of subjects, ranging from farming, natural resources and food systems to rural communities, rural identities and the restructuring of rurality.
期刊最新文献
The cofradías’ role within the Fisheries Local Action Groups system: Implications for small‐scale fisheries in Galicia (Spain) Incentivising public goods delivery in the UK through the lens of Theories of Practice and Theory of Capital ‘We are here our hearts are there’: Rurality, belonging and walking together Relational work in an alternative food network: The fundamental role of shared meaning for organising markets differently Input legitimacy of bottom‐up fishery governance: Lessons from community‐led local development in two Nordic EU countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1