Functional classification and performance in wheelchair basketball

Q4 Social Sciences Studia Sportiva Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5817/sts2022-1-3
R. Ceruso, T. D’Isanto, G. Altavilla, Giovanni Esposito, Felice Di Domenico, F. D’Elia
{"title":"Functional classification and performance in wheelchair basketball","authors":"R. Ceruso, T. D’Isanto, G. Altavilla, Giovanni Esposito, Felice Di Domenico, F. D’Elia","doi":"10.5817/sts2022-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheelchair basketball players are classified into four classes based on the International Wheelchair Basketball Federation competition system. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the IWBF functional classification for wheelchair basketball was related to different performance field-based tests. Forty wheelchair basketball athletes took part in the study. The players carried out five field tests, three of which were quantitative, related to the three conditional skills (strength, endurance and speed test) and two of the qualitative type (accuracy and shooting ability tests). Pearson's correlation was performed to analyse the correlation between the score obtained from functional classification and the results of the wheelchair performance tests. The IWBF class was not correlated (p <0.05) with any of the tests performed. Players with even major injuries, in their best wheelchair set-up, even achieved better times than upper-class players; therefore, the disability factor in these tests is not an index that determines performance disadvantage. The study shows that the functional classification does not affect the qualitative-quantitative performance, so the disabled athlete with a lower score is not disadvantaged in basketball.","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2022-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wheelchair basketball players are classified into four classes based on the International Wheelchair Basketball Federation competition system. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the IWBF functional classification for wheelchair basketball was related to different performance field-based tests. Forty wheelchair basketball athletes took part in the study. The players carried out five field tests, three of which were quantitative, related to the three conditional skills (strength, endurance and speed test) and two of the qualitative type (accuracy and shooting ability tests). Pearson's correlation was performed to analyse the correlation between the score obtained from functional classification and the results of the wheelchair performance tests. The IWBF class was not correlated (p <0.05) with any of the tests performed. Players with even major injuries, in their best wheelchair set-up, even achieved better times than upper-class players; therefore, the disability factor in these tests is not an index that determines performance disadvantage. The study shows that the functional classification does not affect the qualitative-quantitative performance, so the disabled athlete with a lower score is not disadvantaged in basketball.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮椅篮球的功能分类与表现
根据国际轮椅篮球联合会的比赛制度,轮椅篮球运动员分为四个级别。本研究的目的是探讨轮椅篮球的IWBF功能分类是否与不同的场地测试成绩有关。40名轮椅篮球运动员参加了这项研究。运动员们进行了五次实地测试,其中三次是定量的,与三项条件技能(力量、耐力和速度测试)有关,两次是定性的(准确性和射门能力测试)。采用Pearson相关分析功能分类得分与轮椅性能测试结果之间的相关性。IWBF分类与所进行的任何测试均不相关(p <0.05)。即使是严重受伤的球员,在他们最好的轮椅装备下,甚至比上流社会的球员取得了更好的成绩;因此,这些测试中的残疾因素不是确定性能劣势的指标。研究表明,功能分类不影响定性定量成绩,因此得分较低的残疾运动员在篮球运动中并不处于劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Sportiva
Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities Among Teams in Selected Countries with a Focus on Age Variations Examining Diversity and Team Satisfaction: A Quantitative Analysis in Czech Urban and Rural Contexts Kiteboarding Injuries Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running Analysis of University Students' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Mandatory Physical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1