A bibliometric analysis and assessment of container terminal operations research

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS Maritime Business Review Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1108/mabr-07-2022-0035
B. Dragovic, Nenad Đ. Zrnić, E. Tzannatos, N. Kosanić, Andro Dragović
{"title":"A bibliometric analysis and assessment of container terminal operations research","authors":"B. Dragovic, Nenad Đ. Zrnić, E. Tzannatos, N. Kosanić, Andro Dragović","doi":"10.1108/mabr-07-2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper undertakes a bibliometric analysis and assessment of journal publications in the field of container terminal operations research (CTOR), in an attempt to identify high-impact papers (HIPs) published in Science Citation Index/Social Science Citation Index (SCI/SSCI) journals of CTOR subject category from 1973 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachA structured approach for identifying the HIPs is developed based on the utilization of bibliometric and network analyses.FindingsThe CTOR papers are assessed in terms of publication outputs, distribution of outputs in SCI/SSCI journals, authorship, institutions and countries, as well as citation life cycles of papers with the highest total citations since their publication until the year 2020. The results show that between 1989 and 2015, there were 82 HIPs in the field of CTOR, which have been cited at least 200 times, with more than 50% of these citations allocated in the second part of paper citation life cycle according to the database of Google Scholar.Practical implicationsThe practical implication of the aforementioned reviewing and assessing journal publications of CTOR is that it offers the ability to reveal the tone of its development through addressing main characteristics of the relevant HIPs as determined by the highly cited papers in this field of research.Originality/valueThis paper offers a unique analysis and assessment in the field of CTOR by identifying the relevant HIPs and their associated scientific actors (authors, institutions and countries), thus facilitating the future research effort in the field of CTOR.","PeriodicalId":43865,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2022-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe paper undertakes a bibliometric analysis and assessment of journal publications in the field of container terminal operations research (CTOR), in an attempt to identify high-impact papers (HIPs) published in Science Citation Index/Social Science Citation Index (SCI/SSCI) journals of CTOR subject category from 1973 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachA structured approach for identifying the HIPs is developed based on the utilization of bibliometric and network analyses.FindingsThe CTOR papers are assessed in terms of publication outputs, distribution of outputs in SCI/SSCI journals, authorship, institutions and countries, as well as citation life cycles of papers with the highest total citations since their publication until the year 2020. The results show that between 1989 and 2015, there were 82 HIPs in the field of CTOR, which have been cited at least 200 times, with more than 50% of these citations allocated in the second part of paper citation life cycle according to the database of Google Scholar.Practical implicationsThe practical implication of the aforementioned reviewing and assessing journal publications of CTOR is that it offers the ability to reveal the tone of its development through addressing main characteristics of the relevant HIPs as determined by the highly cited papers in this field of research.Originality/valueThis paper offers a unique analysis and assessment in the field of CTOR by identifying the relevant HIPs and their associated scientific actors (authors, institutions and countries), thus facilitating the future research effort in the field of CTOR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集装箱码头运筹学研究的文献计量分析与评价
目的对集装箱码头运筹学(CTOR)领域的期刊出版物进行文献计量分析和评估,试图找出1973 - 2020年在CTOR学科类别的科学引文索引/社会科学引文索引(SCI/SSCI)期刊上发表的高影响力论文(HIPs)。设计/方法学/方法在文献计量学和网络分析的基础上,开发了一种确定HIPs的结构化方法。CTOR论文的评估标准包括发表量、在SCI/SSCI期刊上的产出分布、作者、机构和国家,以及自发表到2020年总被引次数最高的论文的被引生命周期。结果表明,根据谷歌Scholar数据库,1989 - 2015年间,CTOR领域共有82篇论文被引200次以上,其中50%以上被引分布在论文引文生命周期的第二部分。实际意义上述审查和评估CTOR期刊出版物的实际意义是,它提供了通过解决相关HIPs的主要特征来揭示其发展基调的能力,这些特征由该研究领域的高被引论文决定。原创性/价值本文通过识别相关的HIPs及其相关的科学行为体(作者、机构和国家),对CTOR领域进行了独特的分析和评估,从而促进了CTOR领域未来的研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Predictive modelling in the shipping industry: analysis from supply and demand sides Electric tugboat deployment in maritime transportation: detailed analysis of advantages and disadvantages Discovering supply chain operation towards sustainability using machine learning and DES techniques: a case study in Vietnam seafood Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: review and research trend Assessing risk dimensions in dry port projects: prioritization, interdependence and heterogeneity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1