The social geography of the estate landscape in Gelders Arcadië

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE Bulletin KNOB Pub Date : 2021-12-19 DOI:10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.730
Elyze Storms-Smeets
{"title":"The social geography of the estate landscape in Gelders Arcadië","authors":"Elyze Storms-Smeets","doi":"10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many centuries, the landscape and cultural history of the Netherlands have been influenced by the rural estates of large landowners. Their country houses with gardens, parks and farmland formed an important combination of practical aspects of economic management and aesthetic landscaping. Many castles or country houses were linked to large landholdings of several hundred, sometimes even thousands of hectares, as in the case of the Veluwezoom in the Province of Gelderland. Since the late Middle Ages this area, now known as Gelders Arcadia, has been popular with the landed elite, whose ranks have included noble families, stadtholders, city regents and bankers. The undulating landscape, the rivers and brooks and the fertile land was ideally suited to the creation of the desired combination of productive and aesthetic landscapes. \nOne of the special aspects of the Gelders Arcadia estate zone is that it represents nearly every stage in the development of the Dutch country estate, from the emergence of castles and lordships (c. 500-1600), to the foundation of small country retreats by town regents (c. 1600-1800), and the creation of villa-like country estates for a new elite of bankers, industrialists and lawyers (c. 1800-1940). The historic country houses and landed estates are manifestations of their time and therefore very diverse, ranging from transformed noble castles with large landholdings to the rural retreats of town regents to villa-like country houses for the newly wealthy. Not only the architecture of the house and park, but also the use, the anchoring in the cultural landscape and the social significance underwent development. \nA historical-geographical approach was used to analyse location and distribution patterns and to investigate the size, character and functions of country estates in each period from an economic, political, societal and social perspective. It appears that the majority of new country houses and estates were created by a new elite of the newly rich, whereas the old elite continued to invest in their ancestral properties. \nThe motivation to invest in the establishment of a country seat differed per period. The landed and country estates featured both economic and aesthetic landscapes, although the former were less prominent in later periods. \nThis socio-historical-geographical approach has given us a better understanding of the various processes of estate creation, transformation and adaptation through time – knowledge that can also be used to reach well-founded decisions in the 21st century. The geographical approach for Gelders Arcadia has resulted in improved spatial policies through: 1. Attention to the entirety of country estates (rather than only those with listed status); 2. A focus on the country estate as a cohesive heritage ensemble, including an understanding of the social, economic, landscape and political factors that contributed to its development and design; 3. Recognition that the estates, thanks to their large number and individual sizes and qualities, have formed and will continue to form an important basis for the character of the living environment.","PeriodicalId":52053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin KNOB","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin KNOB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many centuries, the landscape and cultural history of the Netherlands have been influenced by the rural estates of large landowners. Their country houses with gardens, parks and farmland formed an important combination of practical aspects of economic management and aesthetic landscaping. Many castles or country houses were linked to large landholdings of several hundred, sometimes even thousands of hectares, as in the case of the Veluwezoom in the Province of Gelderland. Since the late Middle Ages this area, now known as Gelders Arcadia, has been popular with the landed elite, whose ranks have included noble families, stadtholders, city regents and bankers. The undulating landscape, the rivers and brooks and the fertile land was ideally suited to the creation of the desired combination of productive and aesthetic landscapes. One of the special aspects of the Gelders Arcadia estate zone is that it represents nearly every stage in the development of the Dutch country estate, from the emergence of castles and lordships (c. 500-1600), to the foundation of small country retreats by town regents (c. 1600-1800), and the creation of villa-like country estates for a new elite of bankers, industrialists and lawyers (c. 1800-1940). The historic country houses and landed estates are manifestations of their time and therefore very diverse, ranging from transformed noble castles with large landholdings to the rural retreats of town regents to villa-like country houses for the newly wealthy. Not only the architecture of the house and park, but also the use, the anchoring in the cultural landscape and the social significance underwent development. A historical-geographical approach was used to analyse location and distribution patterns and to investigate the size, character and functions of country estates in each period from an economic, political, societal and social perspective. It appears that the majority of new country houses and estates were created by a new elite of the newly rich, whereas the old elite continued to invest in their ancestral properties. The motivation to invest in the establishment of a country seat differed per period. The landed and country estates featured both economic and aesthetic landscapes, although the former were less prominent in later periods. This socio-historical-geographical approach has given us a better understanding of the various processes of estate creation, transformation and adaptation through time – knowledge that can also be used to reach well-founded decisions in the 21st century. The geographical approach for Gelders Arcadia has resulted in improved spatial policies through: 1. Attention to the entirety of country estates (rather than only those with listed status); 2. A focus on the country estate as a cohesive heritage ensemble, including an understanding of the social, economic, landscape and political factors that contributed to its development and design; 3. Recognition that the estates, thanks to their large number and individual sizes and qualities, have formed and will continue to form an important basis for the character of the living environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gelders Arcadië庄园景观的社会地理
几个世纪以来,荷兰的景观和文化历史一直受到大地主乡村庄园的影响。他们的乡村别墅带有花园、公园和农田,形成了经济管理和美学景观的重要结合。许多城堡或乡村别墅都与数百公顷,有时甚至数千公顷的大土地有关,就像Gelderland省的Veluwezoom一样。自中世纪晚期以来,这个地区,现在被称为老年阿卡迪亚,一直受到地主精英的欢迎,他们的阶层包括贵族家庭,税收,城市摄政王和银行家。起伏的景观、河流、小溪和肥沃的土地非常适合创造生产和审美景观的理想组合。盖尔德斯阿卡迪亚地产区的一个特别之处在于,它几乎代表了荷兰乡村地产发展的每一个阶段,从城堡和领主的出现(约500-1600年),到城镇摄政王建立小型乡村度假村(约1600-1800年),以及为银行家、实业家和律师等新精英创建的别墅式乡村地产(约1800-1940年)。历史悠久的乡村别墅和地产是他们那个时代的表现,因此非常多样化,从拥有大片土地的贵族城堡到城镇摄政王的乡村隐居处,再到新贵的别墅式乡村别墅。不仅住宅和公园的建筑,而且其用途、在文化景观中的锚定和社会意义都得到了发展。采用历史-地理方法分析地点和分布模式,并从经济、政治、社会和社会角度调查每个时期乡村庄园的规模、特征和功能。看来,大多数新的乡村别墅和庄园是由新富的新精英建造的,而旧精英则继续投资于他们祖先的财产。投资建立国家席位的动机在每个时期有所不同。土地和乡村庄园的特点是经济和美学景观,尽管前者在后期不那么突出。这种社会历史地理方法使我们更好地理解了遗产的创造、改造和适应的各种过程,这些知识也可以用来在21世纪做出有充分根据的决策。老年阿卡迪亚的地理方法通过以下方式改善了空间政策:关注整个乡村庄园(而不仅仅是那些已列入名单的庄园);2. 将乡村庄园作为一个有凝聚力的遗产整体,包括对其开发和设计的社会、经济、景观和政治因素的理解;3.认识到,由于数量众多,面积和质量各不相同,这些庄园已经并将继续构成生活环境特征的重要基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin KNOB
Bulletin KNOB ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
BRUUT Kunststof dromen Beperkte kansen op een zorgeloze oude dag Utrecht bouwt 1945-1975 | Post 65 - Een turbulente tijd | Experimentele woningbouw in Nederland 1968-1980 Vormgeven aan ontmoeting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1