Mongol Familiarisation with European Medical Practices in the Nineteenth–Twentieth Centuries

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES Inner Asia Pub Date : 2020-11-04 DOI:10.1163/22105018-12340152
B. Norov, Binderiya Batsaikhan, B. Usukhbayar
{"title":"Mongol Familiarisation with European Medical Practices in the Nineteenth–Twentieth Centuries","authors":"B. Norov, Binderiya Batsaikhan, B. Usukhbayar","doi":"10.1163/22105018-12340152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIt was primarily Russian activities in Mongolia between 1860 and 1921, reflecting its geopolitical interests, that introduced European medical practices to the Mongols. Competing alongside other European powers, the Russian Government capitalised on conditions within Mongolia to increase Mongolia’s dependency on Russia. Thus, the Russian government’s motives for medical intervention, like that of other European groups, were mainly political, economic and cultural. In the context of Buddhist dogmatism and the expansive territorial distances between the Mongols (a term this paper uses to encompass all people of Mongol ethnicity in northern and central Asia), the reluctance of Russian doctors to disseminate European medical knowledge prevented its spread into Mongolia. Medical intervention was primarily a method of colonisation justified through healthcare support. Ultimately the familiarisation of European medicine in Mongolia was the first crucial step towards the amalgamation of traditional Mongolian and European medical practices after the Mongolian People’s Revolution.","PeriodicalId":43430,"journal":{"name":"Inner Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22105018-12340152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inner Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22105018-12340152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was primarily Russian activities in Mongolia between 1860 and 1921, reflecting its geopolitical interests, that introduced European medical practices to the Mongols. Competing alongside other European powers, the Russian Government capitalised on conditions within Mongolia to increase Mongolia’s dependency on Russia. Thus, the Russian government’s motives for medical intervention, like that of other European groups, were mainly political, economic and cultural. In the context of Buddhist dogmatism and the expansive territorial distances between the Mongols (a term this paper uses to encompass all people of Mongol ethnicity in northern and central Asia), the reluctance of Russian doctors to disseminate European medical knowledge prevented its spread into Mongolia. Medical intervention was primarily a method of colonisation justified through healthcare support. Ultimately the familiarisation of European medicine in Mongolia was the first crucial step towards the amalgamation of traditional Mongolian and European medical practices after the Mongolian People’s Revolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪至20世纪蒙古人对欧洲医疗实践的熟悉
1860年至1921年间,俄罗斯在蒙古的活动主要反映了其地缘政治利益,将欧洲医疗实践引入蒙古人。与其他欧洲大国竞争,俄罗斯政府利用蒙古内部的条件增加蒙古对俄罗斯的依赖。因此,与其他欧洲国家一样,俄罗斯政府进行医疗干预的动机主要是政治、经济和文化方面的。在佛教教条主义和蒙古人之间广阔的领土距离的背景下(本文使用的术语包括北部和中亚的所有蒙古人),俄罗斯医生不愿传播欧洲医学知识,阻碍了它传播到蒙古。医疗干预主要是一种通过医疗保健支持证明合理的殖民化方法。最终,蒙古对欧洲医学的熟悉是蒙古人民革命后蒙古传统医学和欧洲医学实践融合的第一个关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inner Asia
Inner Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Inner Asia Studies Unit (MIASU) was founded in 1986 as a group within the Department of Social Anthropology to promote research and teaching relating to Mongolia and Inner Asia on an inter-disciplinary basis. The unit aims to promote and encourage study of this important region within and without the University of cambridge, and to provide training and support for research to all those concerned with its understanding. It is currently one of the very few research-oriented forums in the world in which scholars can address the contemporary and historical problems of the region.
期刊最新文献
Chanting Ancestors’ Names The Rise of the Mongols: Five Chinese Sources. Edited and translated, with an Introduction, by Christopher P. Atwood, edited by Christopher P. Atwood Social and Economic Aspects of the Kuhmarim–Sehwalim Mazar in Khotan An Ephemeral State on the Enduring Steppe Urban Hunters: Dealing and Dreaming in Times of Transition, written by Lars Højer & Morten Axel Pedersen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1