{"title":"La exigencia de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administración Pública en Cuba. Limitaciones en su acceso a la justicia administrativa","authors":"Amed Ramírez Sánchez, N. Pérez","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica y el contencioso administrativo constituyen dos garantias basicas que configuran el regimen administrativo en el Estado de derecho. La funcionalidad de ese binomio permite articular las pretensiones indemnizatorias de los ciudadanos ante el poder publico por las lesiones a sus derechos e intereses legitimos. En Cuba, el desarrollo de este binomio ha sido limitado no solo en el orden teorico, sino en su regulacion normativa y realizacion practica, restando eficiencia a su rol garantista en el diseno de derechos y garantias reconocido en el orden constitucional. Sobre esa base, la investigacion tiene como objetivo argumentar las limitaciones dogmaticas del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba en procesos de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administracion Publica, a efectos del perfeccionamiento de su regimen juridico. Para ello, la exposicion de ideas se distribuira en cinco ejes cardinales, partiendo del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba para adentrarse en la configuracion de la legitimacion activa y pasiva para su exigencia, el objeto del contencioso de responsabilidad, para culminar las valoraciones sobre la relacion organo, jurisdiccion y competencia. La investigacion concluye por destacar la necesidad de una reforma de nuestra legislacion del contencioso que se pronuncie por un pleno acceso a su justiciabilidad sobre la base de las deficiencias determinadas, acompanada de la modificacion de los criterios interpretativos con que se maneja nuestra jurisprudencia administrativa, para el logro de la justiciabilidad de la responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica. EnglishThe responsibility of the Public Administration and Administrative Procedure constitute two basic guarantees that configure the administrative regime in the Rule of Law. The functionality of this binomial allows articulating the compensation claims of citizens before the public power for injuries to their rights and legitimate interests. In Cuba, the development of this binomial has been limited not only in the theoretical order, but also in its normative regulation and practical realization, reducing efficiency to its guarantor role in the design of rights and guarantees recognized in the constitutional order. On this basis, the research aims to argue the dogmatic limitations of access to administrative justice in Cuba in processes of patrimonial responsibility of the Public Administration, for the purpose of perfecting its legal regime. To do this, the exposition of ideas will be distributed in five cardinal axes, starting from the access to the administrative justice in Cuba to enter in the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its demand, the object of the contentious of responsibility, to culminate the valuations on the relationship organ, jurisdiction and competition. The investigation concludes by emphasizing the need for a reform of our litigation legislation that is pronounced by a full access to its justifiability on the basis of the determined deficiencies, accompanied by the modification of the interpretive criteria with which our administrative jurisprudence is handled, the achievement of the justifiability of the responsibility of the Public Administration.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"101-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
espanolLa responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica y el contencioso administrativo constituyen dos garantias basicas que configuran el regimen administrativo en el Estado de derecho. La funcionalidad de ese binomio permite articular las pretensiones indemnizatorias de los ciudadanos ante el poder publico por las lesiones a sus derechos e intereses legitimos. En Cuba, el desarrollo de este binomio ha sido limitado no solo en el orden teorico, sino en su regulacion normativa y realizacion practica, restando eficiencia a su rol garantista en el diseno de derechos y garantias reconocido en el orden constitucional. Sobre esa base, la investigacion tiene como objetivo argumentar las limitaciones dogmaticas del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba en procesos de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administracion Publica, a efectos del perfeccionamiento de su regimen juridico. Para ello, la exposicion de ideas se distribuira en cinco ejes cardinales, partiendo del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba para adentrarse en la configuracion de la legitimacion activa y pasiva para su exigencia, el objeto del contencioso de responsabilidad, para culminar las valoraciones sobre la relacion organo, jurisdiccion y competencia. La investigacion concluye por destacar la necesidad de una reforma de nuestra legislacion del contencioso que se pronuncie por un pleno acceso a su justiciabilidad sobre la base de las deficiencias determinadas, acompanada de la modificacion de los criterios interpretativos con que se maneja nuestra jurisprudencia administrativa, para el logro de la justiciabilidad de la responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica. EnglishThe responsibility of the Public Administration and Administrative Procedure constitute two basic guarantees that configure the administrative regime in the Rule of Law. The functionality of this binomial allows articulating the compensation claims of citizens before the public power for injuries to their rights and legitimate interests. In Cuba, the development of this binomial has been limited not only in the theoretical order, but also in its normative regulation and practical realization, reducing efficiency to its guarantor role in the design of rights and guarantees recognized in the constitutional order. On this basis, the research aims to argue the dogmatic limitations of access to administrative justice in Cuba in processes of patrimonial responsibility of the Public Administration, for the purpose of perfecting its legal regime. To do this, the exposition of ideas will be distributed in five cardinal axes, starting from the access to the administrative justice in Cuba to enter in the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its demand, the object of the contentious of responsibility, to culminate the valuations on the relationship organ, jurisdiction and competition. The investigation concludes by emphasizing the need for a reform of our litigation legislation that is pronounced by a full access to its justifiability on the basis of the determined deficiencies, accompanied by the modification of the interpretive criteria with which our administrative jurisprudence is handled, the achievement of the justifiability of the responsibility of the Public Administration.
公共行政责任和行政诉讼是构成法治行政制度的两项基本保障。这一二项式的功能使公民能够就其合法权益受到的损害向公共当局提出赔偿要求。在古巴,这一二项式的发展不仅在理论上受到限制,而且在规范和实际执行方面也受到限制,使其在宪法秩序所承认的权利和保障的设计中发挥保障作用的效率降低。在此基础上,本研究旨在探讨古巴在公共行政世袭责任程序中获得行政司法的教条限制,以完善其法律制度。为此,想法exposicion distribuira五个轴的指南针,诉诸司法行政在古巴进入legitimacion主动和被动的配置要求的责任争议的客体,以完成排行榜能力,管辖权和竞争的关系。调查的结论是,为了我们强调改革legislacion争端,将充分利用法院审理的基础上某些缺陷、acompanada modificacion说明性标准地处理我们的行政判例可否审理,实现公共行政责任。《公共行政责任》和《行政程序》是在法治中确立行政制度的两项基本保障。这两项规定的功能允许在公共权力面前阐明公民因其权利和合法利益受到损害而提出的赔偿要求。在古巴,这一二项式制度的发展不仅在理论上受到限制,而且在规范规范和实际执行方面也受到限制,降低了它在宪法秩序所承认的权利和保障的设计中发挥保障作用的效力。在此基础上,本研究旨在论证在古巴,为了完善其法律制度,在涉及公共行政世袭责任的诉讼中,对行使行政司法的教条限制。To do this, the exposition of ideas将分布式in five基数裁减,starting from the access To the行政司法in古巴To enter the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its需求,the object of the contentious of responsibility To culminate the valuations on the relationship organ,管辖与竞争。调查在文末by为着深刻变革reform of our诉讼立法that is pronounced by a full access to its justifiability根据的果决,陪同by The修改of The interpretive标准with which our administrative is《编辑部,成就《justifiability of The responsibility of The Public Administration。