A risk-neutral approach to the RAROC method of loan pricing using account-level data

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Risk Finance Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1108/jrf-09-2022-0240
A. Misra, Molla Ramizur Rahman, A. Tiwari
{"title":"A risk-neutral approach to the RAROC method of loan pricing using account-level data","authors":"A. Misra, Molla Ramizur Rahman, A. Tiwari","doi":"10.1108/jrf-09-2022-0240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper has used account-level data of corporate and retail borrowers, assessed their credit risk through the risk-neutral principle and examined its implication on loan pricing.Design/methodology/approachIt derives the capital charge and credit risk-premium for expected and unexpected losses through a risk-neutral approach. It estimates the risk-adjusted return on capital as the pricing principle for loans. Using GMM regression, the article has assessed the determinants of risk-based pricing.FindingsIt has been found that risk-premium is not reflected in the current loan pricing policy as per Basel II norms. However, the GMM estimation on RAROC can price risk premium and probability of default, LGD, risk weight, bank beta and capital adequacy, which are the prime determinants of loan pricing. The average RAROC for retail loans is more than that of corporate loans despite the same level of risk capital requirement for both categories of loans. The robustness tests indicate that the RAROC method of loan pricing and its determinants are consistent against the time and type of borrowers.Research limitations/implicationsThe RAROC method of pricing effectively assesses the inherent risk associated with loans. Though the empirical findings are confined to the sample bank, the model can be used for any bank implementing the Basel principle of risk and capital assessments.Practical implicationsThe article has developed and validated the model for estimating RAROC, as per Basel II guidelines, for loan pricing that any bank can use.Social implicationsIt has developed the risk-based loan pricing model for retail and corporate borrowers. It has significant practical utility for banks to manage their risk, reduce their losses and productively utilise the public deposits for societal developments.Originality/valueThe article empirically validated the risk-neutral pricing principle using a unique 1,520 retail and corporate borrowers dataset.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-09-2022-0240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThis paper has used account-level data of corporate and retail borrowers, assessed their credit risk through the risk-neutral principle and examined its implication on loan pricing.Design/methodology/approachIt derives the capital charge and credit risk-premium for expected and unexpected losses through a risk-neutral approach. It estimates the risk-adjusted return on capital as the pricing principle for loans. Using GMM regression, the article has assessed the determinants of risk-based pricing.FindingsIt has been found that risk-premium is not reflected in the current loan pricing policy as per Basel II norms. However, the GMM estimation on RAROC can price risk premium and probability of default, LGD, risk weight, bank beta and capital adequacy, which are the prime determinants of loan pricing. The average RAROC for retail loans is more than that of corporate loans despite the same level of risk capital requirement for both categories of loans. The robustness tests indicate that the RAROC method of loan pricing and its determinants are consistent against the time and type of borrowers.Research limitations/implicationsThe RAROC method of pricing effectively assesses the inherent risk associated with loans. Though the empirical findings are confined to the sample bank, the model can be used for any bank implementing the Basel principle of risk and capital assessments.Practical implicationsThe article has developed and validated the model for estimating RAROC, as per Basel II guidelines, for loan pricing that any bank can use.Social implicationsIt has developed the risk-based loan pricing model for retail and corporate borrowers. It has significant practical utility for banks to manage their risk, reduce their losses and productively utilise the public deposits for societal developments.Originality/valueThe article empirically validated the risk-neutral pricing principle using a unique 1,520 retail and corporate borrowers dataset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用账户级数据的RAROC贷款定价方法的风险中性方法
目的本文利用企业和零售借款人的账户层面数据,通过风险中性原则评估其信用风险,并考察其对贷款定价的影响。设计/方法/方法通过风险中性方法得出预期和意外损失的资本费用和信贷风险溢价。它估计风险调整后的资本回报率作为贷款的定价原则。使用GMM回归,本文评估了基于风险的定价的决定因素。发现根据巴塞尔协议II的规范,风险溢价没有反映在当前的贷款定价政策中。然而,对RAROC的GMM估计可以对风险溢价和违约概率、LGD、风险权重、银行贝塔系数和资本充足率进行定价,这是贷款定价的主要决定因素。零售贷款的平均RAROC高于企业贷款,尽管这两类贷款的风险资本要求水平相同。稳健性测试表明,RAROC贷款定价方法及其决定因素与借款人的时间和类型是一致的。研究局限性/含义RAROC定价方法有效评估了与贷款相关的固有风险。尽管实证结果仅限于样本银行,但该模型可用于任何实施巴塞尔风险和资本评估原则的银行。实际含义本文根据巴塞尔协议II的指导方针,开发并验证了任何银行都可以使用的贷款定价的RAROC估计模型。社会影响它为零售和企业借款人开发了基于风险的贷款定价模型。它对银行管理风险、减少损失和有效利用公众存款促进社会发展具有重要的实际效用。原创性/价值本文使用一个独特的1520零售和企业借款人数据集,实证验证了风险中性定价原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
期刊最新文献
Contagion in the Euro area sovereign CDS market: a spatial approach Environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and CDS spreads: the role of country sustainability Spillover effects of CEO performance-induced removal on competitor CEOs' firms' financial policies Capital structure and default risk of small and medium enterprises: evidence from Algeria Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1