Mediating Feuerbach and Barth: Bonhoeffer's this-worldly theology

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1017/s0036930623000364
Frank Della Torre II
{"title":"Mediating Feuerbach and Barth: Bonhoeffer's this-worldly theology","authors":"Frank Della Torre II","doi":"10.1017/s0036930623000364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, I revisit a debate between Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Barth, known as the ‘Barth–Feuerbach confrontation’. I begin by framing the contours of this dispute as it was initiated by Barth and carried forward by his interpreters, who have sought in vain to make Barth's and Feuerbach's positions commensurable. Having narrated the history of this ongoing scholarly discussion and clarified why it remains intractable, I turn to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, whose this-worldly conception of theology, I argue, provides resources for ‘mediating’ the insights of Feuerbach and Barth. By attending to Bonhoeffer's earliest engagements with Barth on the question of divine revelation, and by exploring his striking proximity to Feuerbach on the issue of this-worldliness, we can see how Bonhoeffer helps overcome not only the dichotomies that plague the Barth–Feuerbach confrontation but also those that pervade modern attempts to safeguard this-worldliness by dispensing with divine transcendence.","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930623000364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I revisit a debate between Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Barth, known as the ‘Barth–Feuerbach confrontation’. I begin by framing the contours of this dispute as it was initiated by Barth and carried forward by his interpreters, who have sought in vain to make Barth's and Feuerbach's positions commensurable. Having narrated the history of this ongoing scholarly discussion and clarified why it remains intractable, I turn to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, whose this-worldly conception of theology, I argue, provides resources for ‘mediating’ the insights of Feuerbach and Barth. By attending to Bonhoeffer's earliest engagements with Barth on the question of divine revelation, and by exploring his striking proximity to Feuerbach on the issue of this-worldliness, we can see how Bonhoeffer helps overcome not only the dichotomies that plague the Barth–Feuerbach confrontation but also those that pervade modern attempts to safeguard this-worldliness by dispensing with divine transcendence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调解费尔巴哈与巴特:朋霍费尔的世俗神学
在本文中,我重温了路德维希·费尔巴哈和卡尔·巴特之间的一场辩论,被称为“巴特-费尔巴哈对抗”。我首先勾勒出这场争论的轮廓,因为它是由巴特发起的,并由他的诠释者发扬,他们徒劳地试图使巴特和费尔巴哈的立场可以比较。在叙述了这一正在进行的学术讨论的历史并澄清了为什么它仍然难以解决之后,我转向迪特里希·邦霍费尔(Dietrich Bonhoeffer),我认为,他的这种世俗的神学概念为“调解”费尔巴哈和巴特的见解提供了资源。通过关注朋霍费尔与巴特在神圣启示问题上的早期接触,通过探索他与费尔巴哈在世俗性问题上惊人的接近,我们可以看到,朋霍费尔不仅帮助克服了困扰巴特与费尔巴哈对抗的二分法,还帮助克服了那些弥漫在现代试图通过摒弃神圣超越性来维护世俗性的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions Apocalyptic praxis in Evagrius of Pontus and Francis of Assisi Beyond text to God: Bonaventure's transformation of exegetical method from his Breviloquium to Itinerarium mentis in Deum (1257–1259) ‘The visible renewal of human life’: Barth's ethical assessment of the Reformed confessions The beauty of the body and the ascension: A reclamation and subversion of physical beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1