The cognitive foundations of learning to read: a framework for preventing and remediating reading difficulties

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19404158.2019.1614081
W. Tunmer, Wesley A. Hoover
{"title":"The cognitive foundations of learning to read: a framework for preventing and remediating reading difficulties","authors":"W. Tunmer, Wesley A. Hoover","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2019.1614081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents an overview of a conceptual framework designed to help reading professionals better understand what their students are facing as they learn to read in alphabetic writing systems. The US National Reading Panel (NRP) recommended five instructional components for improving reading outcomes but presented these instructional components as a list without explicitly addressing their interrelations, either in terms of instruction or cognitive development. In contrast, the Cognitive Foundations Framework offers a description of the major cognitive capacities underlying learning to read and specifies the relationships between them. The central claim of this article is that what is needed to help intervention specialists achieve better outcomes is a clearly specified conceptual framework of the cognitive capacities underlying learning to read that provides the basis for an assessment framework that is linked to evidence-based instructional strategies for addressing the individual literacy learning needs of students.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"24 1","pages":"75 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2019.1614081","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1614081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents an overview of a conceptual framework designed to help reading professionals better understand what their students are facing as they learn to read in alphabetic writing systems. The US National Reading Panel (NRP) recommended five instructional components for improving reading outcomes but presented these instructional components as a list without explicitly addressing their interrelations, either in terms of instruction or cognitive development. In contrast, the Cognitive Foundations Framework offers a description of the major cognitive capacities underlying learning to read and specifies the relationships between them. The central claim of this article is that what is needed to help intervention specialists achieve better outcomes is a clearly specified conceptual framework of the cognitive capacities underlying learning to read that provides the basis for an assessment framework that is linked to evidence-based instructional strategies for addressing the individual literacy learning needs of students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习阅读的认知基础:预防和纠正阅读困难的框架
摘要本文概述了一个概念框架,旨在帮助阅读专业人员更好地理解学生在字母书写系统中学习阅读时所面临的问题。美国国家阅读小组(NRP)建议了五个提高阅读成绩的教学组成部分,但将这些教学组成部分列为一个列表,没有明确说明它们在教学或认知发展方面的相互关系。相比之下,认知基础框架提供了对学习阅读的主要认知能力的描述,并规定了它们之间的关系。这篇文章的核心主张是,帮助干预专家取得更好的结果所需要的是一个明确规定的阅读学习认知能力的概念框架,该框架为评估框架提供了基础,该框架与基于证据的教学策略相联系,以满足学生的个人识字学习需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Build it and they will come: responses to the provision of online science of language and reading professional learning “It is more than the average parent goes through”: using the experiences of Australian parents of dyslexic children to draw a distinction between advocacy and allyship The impact of an online training program on pre-service teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about dyslexia An implementation case study for the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach for oral language and reading instruction in the early years of primary school A Linguistic Approach to the Study of Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1